Why Did Florida Just Reject Santa Ono The Shocking Twist Behind His Failed Bid

In a stunning and unprecedented reversal, Santa Ono, the former president of the University of Michigan, has been officially rejected for the role of president at the University of Florida — despite being the sole finalist and receiving unanimous support from Florida’s Board of Trustees just a week earlier. The fallout has ignited fresh debate about the politicization of higher education in the United States.

The rejection came on June 3, when Florida’s Board of Governors voted 10–6 against Ono’s nomination following a tidal wave of criticism from conservative lawmakers and political commentators. Much of the backlash stemmed from Ono’s prior support of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs during his time in Ann Arbor — policies that many Florida Republicans and conservative voices view as ideological overreach.

Ono had resigned from the University of Michigan last month in anticipation of accepting the Florida position. The proposed contract in Gainesville could have reportedly paid him up to $15 million over five years. However, critics claimed that his history of supporting DEI, accommodating pro-Palestinian protests, and promoting other progressive initiatives ran contrary to Florida’s evolving vision under Governor Ron DeSantis.

Prominent GOP figures like Senator Rick Scott, Donald Trump Jr., and several Florida congressmen openly opposed Ono’s candidacy. On social media, Scott accused Ono of “allowing an illegal, pro-terrorist encampment” at U-M, claiming it endangered Jewish students and reflected failed leadership. Others attacked Ono’s climate change efforts and previous statements about gender ideology and race-based admissions policies.

During the confirmation meeting, Ono attempted to walk a political tightrope, acknowledging that while he once supported DEI, he later began to scale it back after recognizing it had shifted from equal opportunity to bureaucracy. “I believe in Florida’s vision for higher education,” he stated. But for some board members, the pivot felt less like personal growth and more like opportunism.

Board member Rick Scott questioned the sincerity of Ono’s ideological transformation, saying: “Now we are told to believe you are abandoning an entire ideological architecture? That doesn’t add up.” The tense atmosphere drew concern from other board members, who argued that the process resembled an interrogation rather than a professional vetting.

Ono’s academic resume is expansive — including previous presidencies at the University of British Columbia and the University of Cincinnati. His sudden fall from grace in Florida signals how deeply national politics have penetrated university leadership searches, particularly in red states prioritizing cultural realignment.

Meanwhile, the University of Florida is left restarting its search for a new president, after a turbulent year following Ben Sasse’s abrupt departure due to personal reasons — and amid controversy over his lavish university spending.

As for Ono, his next move remains uncertain. But one thing is clear: in the current American educational landscape, academic leadership has become just as much about ideology as it is about experience.