Nearly three decades after the fatal shooting of Tupac Shakur, the only man ever charged in connection with the iconic rapper’s death is now asking a court to slam the brakes on what prosecutors can show a jury.

Duane Davis, widely known as Keffe D, has filed a motion seeking to suppress key evidence in the high-profile case, arguing that the judge who allowed the prosecution to move forward relied on what his attorneys call a “misleading portrait” of Davis as a violent drug dealer.

The filing, according to court documents, claims that prosecutors leaned heavily on Davis’ past statements and alleged criminal associations to justify the charges—without sufficiently tying those claims to the 1996 drive-by shooting that killed Shakur. His defense insists this framing unfairly prejudices the court and any potential jury before the case even reaches trial.

ALSO READ : “She Never Made It Out…” Albany House Fire Claims Woman’s Life as Family Pleads for Help to Bring Her Home

A case frozen in time — until now

Shakur was shot multiple times while riding in a BMW in Las Vegas after attending a boxing match in September 1996. He died six days later, at just 25, leaving behind a musical legacy that still shapes hip-hop culture worldwide. For years, the killing fueled conspiracy theories, documentaries, and books, but no criminal charges were filed—until 2023, when Davis was arrested.

Prosecutors allege Davis orchestrated the shooting from the front passenger seat of the car involved, a claim largely built on his own past interviews and memoir-like statements. Davis, however, has pleaded not guilty.

Defense pushes back: “Character assassination”

In the latest motion, Davis’ lawyers argue that the state’s narrative leans too heavily on character evidence—painting him as a longtime gang-affiliated drug trafficker—to convince the court he was capable of murder. They say this approach crosses a legal line.

According to the defense, the judge who previously upheld the charges relied on a version of Davis’ life that was “inflated and selectively presented,” potentially violating his right to a fair trial. They want certain statements, recordings, and references to his alleged criminal past excluded, contending that they are more prejudicial than probative.

Legal experts note that if the court agrees, it could significantly narrow what prosecutors are allowed to present, forcing them to rely on a much tighter set of facts directly linked to Shakur’s killing.

Prosecutors stand firm

The state has countered that Davis’ own words—given voluntarily over many years—are central to understanding his alleged role. They argue that context matters and that his background helps explain motive, opportunity, and credibility.

This clash sets the stage for what could be one of the most consequential pretrial rulings in the case. A decision in Davis’ favor would not end the prosecution, but it could weaken a case that already hinges on events nearly 30 years old.

Why this moment matters

For fans of Tupac Shakur, the case represents the closest the justice system has come to addressing one of music’s most haunting unsolved murders. For the courts, it’s a reminder of how fragile cold cases can be—especially when built on memories, interviews, and reputations shaped long after the crime itself.

As the judge weighs whether the evidence crosses the line from context to character assassination, one thing is clear: the outcome of this motion may determine whether the Tupac Shakur murder trial unfolds before a jury—or quietly unravels before it ever begins.

Nearly three decades after the fatal shooting of Tupac Shakur, the only man ever charged in connection with the iconic rapper’s death is now asking a court to slam the brakes on what prosecutors can show a jury.

Duane Davis, widely known as Keffe D, has filed a motion seeking to suppress key evidence in the high-profile case, arguing that the judge who allowed the prosecution to move forward relied on what his attorneys call a “misleading portrait” of Davis as a violent drug dealer.

The filing, according to court documents, claims that prosecutors leaned heavily on Davis’ past statements and alleged criminal associations to justify the charges—without sufficiently tying those claims to the 1996 drive-by shooting that killed Shakur. His defense insists this framing unfairly prejudices the court and any potential jury before the case even reaches trial.

ALSO READ : “She Never Made It Out…” Albany House Fire Claims Woman’s Life as Family Pleads for Help to Bring Her Home

A case frozen in time — until now

Shakur was shot multiple times while riding in a BMW in Las Vegas after attending a boxing match in September 1996. He died six days later, at just 25, leaving behind a musical legacy that still shapes hip-hop culture worldwide. For years, the killing fueled conspiracy theories, documentaries, and books, but no criminal charges were filed—until 2023, when Davis was arrested.

Prosecutors allege Davis orchestrated the shooting from the front passenger seat of the car involved, a claim largely built on his own past interviews and memoir-like statements. Davis, however, has pleaded not guilty.

Defense pushes back: “Character assassination”

In the latest motion, Davis’ lawyers argue that the state’s narrative leans too heavily on character evidence—painting him as a longtime gang-affiliated drug trafficker—to convince the court he was capable of murder. They say this approach crosses a legal line.

According to the defense, the judge who previously upheld the charges relied on a version of Davis’ life that was “inflated and selectively presented,” potentially violating his right to a fair trial. They want certain statements, recordings, and references to his alleged criminal past excluded, contending that they are more prejudicial than probative.

Legal experts note that if the court agrees, it could significantly narrow what prosecutors are allowed to present, forcing them to rely on a much tighter set of facts directly linked to Shakur’s killing.

Prosecutors stand firm

The state has countered that Davis’ own words—given voluntarily over many years—are central to understanding his alleged role. They argue that context matters and that his background helps explain motive, opportunity, and credibility.

This clash sets the stage for what could be one of the most consequential pretrial rulings in the case. A decision in Davis’ favor would not end the prosecution, but it could weaken a case that already hinges on events nearly 30 years old.

Why this moment matters

For fans of Tupac Shakur, the case represents the closest the justice system has come to addressing one of music’s most haunting unsolved murders. For the courts, it’s a reminder of how fragile cold cases can be—especially when built on memories, interviews, and reputations shaped long after the crime itself.

As the judge weighs whether the evidence crosses the line from context to character assassination, one thing is clear: the outcome of this motion may determine whether the Tupac Shakur murder trial unfolds before a jury—or quietly unravels before it ever begins.

A late-night road collision in eastern England escalated into a fatal police shooting on Sunday, leaving a man dead and a community searching for answers. According to Norfolk Police, the incident unfolded after a two-vehicle crash in Thetford, when officers encountered a man believed to be armed with a handgun.

Police were first alerted to the crash on London Road at approximately 8:25 pm GMT, following reports of a collision involving two vehicles. Officers arriving at the scene were told that one of the drivers had fled on foot, carrying what witnesses described as a firearm.

Armed response officers were deployed shortly afterward. The suspect was located a short distance from the crash site and was shot by police. Despite emergency medical efforts, he was pronounced dead at the scene.

Independent watchdog steps in

In line with UK protocol for fatal police shootings, the case has been formally referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which will independently assess the actions taken by officers.

Assistant Chief Constable David Buckley acknowledged the seriousness of the incident and the concern it may cause locally.

“We understand this incident will cause concern in the community,” Buckley said. “While our highly trained armed officers respond to hundreds of firearms-related calls each year, incidents where police discharge firearms are thankfully incredibly rare.”

He added that Norfolk Police are fully cooperating with investigators and have already committed to handing over body-worn camera footage and 999 emergency call recordings to ensure transparency.

Roads closed, questions remain

Following the shooting, the A11 road was closed in both directions between the Thetford Ranges and Brandon Road roundabouts, causing significant disruption to traffic in the area. Authorities have not yet indicated when the road will fully reopen.

Police also confirmed that no other suspects are being sought, suggesting the incident was contained to a single individual.

A rare but serious moment

Fatal police shootings remain uncommon in the United Kingdom, where most officers do not routinely carry firearms. When such incidents occur, they often spark intense public scrutiny and debate over the use of force, accountability, and public safety.

As the IOPC investigation progresses, further details are expected to emerge about what led officers to open fire and whether the perceived threat justified lethal force. Until then, officials say patience and due process are essential.

For residents of Thetford, the incident has cast a heavy shadow over what began as an ordinary Sunday evening — turning a routine traffic collision into a case that will now be examined at the highest levels of police oversight.

For more Update- DAILY GLOBAL DIARY