Once the world’s most admired tech visionary, Elon Musk has found himself at the center of an uncomfortable paradox: his own political persona may be undermining his company’s success. A new Yale University study, released through the National Bureau of Economic Research, concludes that Musk’s increasingly partisan behavior since buying Twitter (X) in 2022 has directly led to the loss of more than a million potential Tesla sales across the United States.

The researchers estimate that between October 2022 and April 2025, the “Musk Partisan Effect” caused Tesla’s U.S. sales to fall short by roughly 1 million to 1.26 million vehicles. That’s an astonishing number for a brand once synonymous with sustainability and innovation.

The “Musk Partisan Effect” Explained

The study links county-level voting trends to changes in electric vehicle (EV) registrations. In Democratic-leaning areas—long Tesla’s strongest markets—sales fell sharply after Musk’s takeover of Twitter (X). Before 2022, Tesla had been the undisputed EV leader among liberal buyers; after 2022, registrations flattened or dropped while rival brands like Ford, Hyundai, and Kia gained traction.

ALSO READ : Rockets Guard Fred VanVleet Tears ACL and Likely to Miss 2025-26 Season

One author of the study summarized:

“By early 2025, without the partisan effect, Tesla’s monthly sales could have been 150 percent higher.”

In essence, Musk’s public political endorsements and polarizing posts on X transformed Tesla from an environmentally-driven tech brand into a cultural lightning rod.

From Innovation to Ideology

Musk’s growing alignment with conservative politics—through endorsements of Republican Party candidates and frequent criticism of progressive policies—has sharply divided public opinion. For many once-loyal Tesla enthusiasts, his social-media persona became impossible to ignore.

Analysts at Axios and Reuters note that Tesla didn’t simply swap liberal buyers for conservative ones; it just lost them. The study shows no meaningful uptick in purchases from traditionally Republican regions, meaning the damage wasn’t offset.

Economic and Brand Consequences

The report lands at a precarious moment for Tesla. U.S. market share in EVs has slid to about 46 percent — its lowest since 2018 — while competition intensifies. In California, once Tesla’s crown jewel, registrations are down nearly 10 percent year-over-year.

Market strategists like Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities have warned investors that “Musk’s political brand volatility could become Tesla’s biggest intangible liability.”

Still, Tesla presses on with bold ventures — from the Cybertruck rollout to humanoid robotics — while Musk insists his freedom of speech is “non-negotiable.”

The Broader Lesson

The Yale researchers call the trend “a cautionary tale for founder-led brands.” When a CEO’s personal ideology overshadows the product, the company’s image risks being hijacked by culture-war dynamics.

Historian Jon Meacham told CNN the study “illustrates how charisma can cross into cult — and in the marketplace, that crossover costs money.”

For now, Tesla’s future depends on whether consumers can separate the cars from the character steering the brand.

For nearly two decades, millions of UK motorists may have unknowingly signed unfair car finance deals. Now, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has confirmed that compensation is on the way—but the average payout could be far lower than many expected.

The FCA revealed that around 14 million motor finance agreements signed between April 2007 and November 2024 will be reviewed, with an estimated £8.2bn in compensation. However, instead of the previously suggested £950 per claim, the watchdog now says drivers can expect around £700 on average per deal.

“This is about fairness. Customers deserve proper compensation,” said Nikhil Rathi, the FCA’s Chief Executive.

What Went Wrong With Car Finance?

The scandal revolves around discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs)—a system that allowed car dealers to earn higher commissions when they arranged loans at higher interest rates for customers. These commissions were often undisclosed, leaving buyers unknowingly paying thousands more.

The FCA banned DCAs in 2021, but its investigation uncovered widespread mis-selling practices dating back to 2007. The review also flagged other unfair practices, including inflated contracts and misleading information given to buyers.

Who Is Eligible For Compensation?

The FCA estimates that 44% of all motor finance agreements since 2007 are affected. Under the new scheme:

• Lenders will contact drivers who already lodged complaints.
• Those who complained earlier may receive payouts faster.
• Drivers who never complained will be contacted within six months of the scheme’s launch and asked to opt in.
• Consumers not directly contacted will still have up to a year to make a claim.

Importantly, motorists do not need to use claims management companies, which often take large cuts of compensation. The FCA has already shut down over 700 misleading adverts from such firms.

Industry Pushback

While the FCA says its plan strikes a “fair balance,” not everyone agrees.

Adrian Dally of the Finance and Leasing Association argued that the regulator is “overcompensating,” suggesting that the scale of losses outlined by the FCA was “implausibly high.”

Meanwhile, consumer rights advocates say the £700 average payout may fall short of the financial harm many families experienced. David Bott, senior partner at Bott and Co, warned:

“The true measure of success will be whether this scheme delivers meaningful compensation that reflects the real harm consumers suffered.”

Lessons From PPI

The car finance scandal is drawing comparisons to the infamous Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) mis-selling fiasco, which saw UK banks pay out over £38bn in compensation. But unlike PPI, the FCA has said that interest on redress in this scheme will be much lower, potentially reducing final payouts further.

What Happens Next?

Motorists will need to wait for the scheme’s official rollout. The FCA insists the process will be free and transparent, but consumers still have the option to pursue legal action if they believe the FCA’s payouts do not cover their losses.

With two million cars sold on finance every year, the scandal highlights just how deeply flawed commission-based arrangements had become. For now, Britain’s drivers may have to settle for a payout that feels smaller than expected—but one that finally acknowledges years of unfair treatment.
For more Update http://www.dailyglobaldiary.com

Tesla has finally taken the wraps off the long-promised affordable versions of its flagship cars — the Model 3 Standard and Model Y Standard. But while customers may be excited by lower prices, the unveiling has left investors wondering if the move is bold enough to counter fierce competition.

The new Model 3 Standard will start at $38,630 (including destination and order fees) and will be available by December or January. The Model Y Standard is priced at $41,630 and will roll out between November and December. Both trims are significantly cheaper — $5,500 and $5,000 less, respectively — compared to their “Premium” counterparts.

The announcement came not through a traditional auto show, but on Elon Musk’s own platform, X, adding his usual flair to Tesla’s global communication strategy.

A stripped-down Tesla experience

While the price drop will appeal to budget-conscious buyers, Tesla made some compromises. According to the company’s official site, the Standard trims will have:

• 
  No eight-inch second-row touchscreen
• Only seven speakers (instead of 15 with a subwoofer)
• A cloth interior instead of the cloth and “microsuede” blend
• Passive shock absorbers instead of “frequency dependent” versions
• Slower 0–60 mph acceleration

Still, the Standard versions offer slightly longer range than the high-performance models, ensuring practicality for everyday use.

Timing, market dynamics, and investor jitters

Tesla’s timing isn’t coincidental. The launch follows the expiration of the $7,500 federal tax credit for many EV buyers in the United States. The company had posted record sales in Q3, largely from buyers rushing to beat the deadline. Yet, after Tuesday’s unveiling, Tesla shares (NASDAQ: TSLA) dropped 4%, reflecting market skepticism.

During an April investor call, CFO Vaibhav Taneja reassured stakeholders that the lower-cost models were coming in 2025. “We started production in the first half of 2025 as planned… but the ramp will be slower than initially expected,” he said.

Pressure from rivals

Tesla may have been the pioneer of modern EVs, but the landscape has changed dramatically. Chinese automaker BYD is on track to overtake Tesla as the world’s largest EV seller when full-year figures are released in January. Meanwhile, Hyundai recently announced EVs priced nearly $9,800 cheaper than older models, intensifying competition in the mid-range segment.

Tesla’s latest move could be an attempt to address excess factory capacity in the U.S., where domestic sales make up nearly half of its global revenue. However, the EV giant faces a delicate balancing act — cutting prices enough to attract buyers without hurting margins in an increasingly competitive field.

Beyond cars: politics and protests

Adding to the headwinds, Tesla has been facing political backlash. Protests and vandalism have been reported at dealerships in both the U.S. and Europe over Elon Musk’s past ties to the Donald Trump administration and his vocal support for certain right-wing figures. Musk later distanced himself from Trump, but that pivot seems to have alienated some conservatives who once admired the company.

Trump himself, before their split, had publicly urged Americans to “go buy Tesla cars.” Today, the optics are more complicated, as Tesla navigates both consumer markets and political minefields.

The road ahead

For now, Tesla’s Standard models offer a cheaper entry point for new buyers, but the real question remains — will it be enough to retain dominance in a market where affordability and innovation go hand in hand? With rivals like BYD and Hyundai gaining ground, the pressure is on Elon Musk to prove that Tesla can still set the pace for the EV industry.
For more Update http://www.dailyglobaldiary.com