Music icon Neil Young is once again taking a stand — this time, against two of the world’s most powerful tech billionaires. The “Heart of Gold” singer revealed he will remove his entire music catalog from Amazon Music, while also urging fans to boycott Amazon, Whole Foods, and Meta — accusing Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg of “selling out America.”

The 79-year-old artist posted the announcement on his Neil Young Archives website, where he directly criticized Bezos’ political stance and Meta’s influence on public discourse.

“Forget Amazon and Whole Foods. Forget Facebook. Buy local. Buy direct,” the statement read. “Bezos supports this government. We all have to give up something to save America from the Corporate Control Age.”

‘Corporate Control Age’: Young’s Latest Rebellion

Neil Young, known for his decades-long activism and outspokenness, has often used his platform to challenge corporate power and environmental negligence. This latest decision, however, marks one of his strongest protests yet — one that targets the core of modern consumerism and technology.

ALSO READ : Angelina Jolie Calls Brad Pitt’s NDA Demand ‘Extremely Painful’ — Reveals New Details from Their Legal Battle

He accused Amazon and its subsidiaries of monopolizing markets and shaping political narratives. Similarly, Young called out Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, suggesting that social media platforms like Facebook have become instruments of misinformation and manipulation.

“It is easy to buy local,” Young wrote. “Support your community. Don’t go back to the big corporations who have sold out America. They need you to buy from them — don’t.”

A Clash Between Music and Big Tech

Young’s feud with streaming platforms isn’t new. In 2022, he famously pulled his music from Spotify in protest against what he called the platform’s tolerance of “dangerous misinformation.” That move sparked a global debate about free speech, artist rights, and corporate accountability.

This time, however, his target is broader — taking aim at Jeff Bezos, one of the world’s richest men, and Mark Zuckerberg, whose platforms dominate global communication.

Young’s decision to exit Amazon Music underscores a larger conversation about artists’ control over their work and the moral responsibilities of digital platforms. It also aligns with his long history of prioritizing integrity over profit.

“Neil doesn’t just write songs — he lives his convictions,” said one of his longtime collaborators. “He’s been saying the same thing since the ’60s: music and money don’t mix when your soul’s at stake.”

‘Forget Bezos, Forget Zuckerberg’: The Boycott Call

Young’s website didn’t stop at pulling his catalog — it explicitly called for a public boycott of Amazon, Whole Foods, and Meta-owned platforms like Facebook and Instagram.

The post featured the logos of each company, with a bold message urging fans to “walk away from corporate giants” and “reclaim the American spirit of independence.”

This message has already divided fans on X (Twitter), where some praised the rock legend for his consistency, while others argued that avoiding these platforms entirely in modern life is nearly impossible.

Still, Young’s protest has reignited conversations about Big Tech’s growing power and its influence on democracy, media, and consumer behavior.

The Man Who Never Backed Down

Born in Toronto, Canada, and later becoming a naturalized American citizen, Neil Young has always mixed his music with his moral compass. From anti-war anthems in the 1970s to environmental activism through Farm Aid and Bridge School Benefit concerts, he has consistently challenged authority — whether political, corporate, or cultural.

In the past, he’s criticized Donald Trump for using his songs at political rallies and clashed with record labels over creative control. His latest protest feels like an extension of that same rebellious energy, now focused squarely on Silicon Valley’s billionaires.

“We are entering an age of control — not freedom,” he warned. “If people don’t resist, art will no longer belong to artists. It will belong to corporations.”

Industry Reaction and What Comes Next

So far, Amazon Music has not released an official statement regarding Young’s removal. However, industry analysts believe the move, while symbolic, could inspire other artists to re-evaluate their partnerships with major streaming and retail platforms.

Tech reporters also note that Young’s boycott aligns with a broader cultural shift — one where consumers are increasingly skeptical of corporate ethics, privacy issues, and monopolistic practices.

For now, Young’s music will remain accessible on Apple Music and his official website, where he encourages fans to support his work “directly and locally.”

“Neil Young has always been the conscience of rock,” wrote one fan on X. “Even if you don’t agree with him, you have to admire his courage to act when others stay silent.”

A Protest That Echoes Through Time

For a man whose career has spanned over six decades, Neil Young’s words still carry the raw power of defiance. In an era dominated by algorithms, AI, and corporate control, his message — buy local, think independently — feels both nostalgic and revolutionary.

Whether this boycott will impact Amazon or Meta remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: Neil Young’s fight for artistic and ethical freedom is far from over.

The entertainment world has been shaken by another troubling controversy — this time involving David Del Rio, one of the stars of CBS’s legal drama Matlock.

According to multiple reports from Variety and Deadline, Del Rio was fired from the series following allegations of sexual assault made by a female co-star. CBS confirmed his departure on Thursday, October 9, but declined to comment on the specifics of the ongoing investigation.

“David Del Rio is no longer part of the production of Matlock,” a CBS Studios spokesperson told USA Today, refusing to elaborate further.

Sources close to the production revealed that Del Rio was escorted off set last week after an internal inquiry was launched into the alleged incident.

ALSO READ : Sabrina Carpenter Net Worth 2025 Revealed How the Espresso Queen Became One of Pop Music’s Richest Young Stars

The Allegations and Investigation

While details remain scarce, industry insiders told USA Today that CBS Studios was alerted to the incident earlier this month, prompting an immediate investigation.

The alleged assault reportedly occurred at the beginning of October and involved one of Del Rio’s female co-stars, whose identity has not been disclosed. Following interviews and fact-finding conducted by studio representatives, the network made the decision to terminate Del Rio’s contract.

Deadline first reported that the actor was removed from the set shortly after the studio was informed of the incident.

Neither Del Rio nor his representatives have commented publicly on the allegations. As of now, no official criminal complaint has been confirmed, and law enforcement involvement has not been publicly reported.

Who Is David Del Rio?

Del Rio, 33, gained recognition for his roles in Pitch Perfect (2012) and the Fox sitcom Grease Live! before landing his role in CBS’s Matlock reboot.

In the series, which stars Kathy Bates as defense attorney Madeline “Matty” Matlock, Del Rio played Billy Martinez, a charismatic young lawyer and key member of Matlock’s legal team.

The reboot, which premiered earlier this year, reimagines the beloved courtroom drama that originally starred Andy Griffith and Nancy Stafford in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Fans had praised Del Rio’s performance as a rising star with strong screen presence — making this latest development even more shocking for both viewers and industry peers.

CBS’s Swift Response

CBS has maintained a “zero tolerance” policy regarding sexual misconduct in the workplace, particularly following the high-profile scandals that reshaped Hollywood in recent years.

After receiving the initial report, the studio reportedly acted quickly to initiate an internal probe, removing Del Rio from production during the investigation. The network has not announced whether his character will be recast or written out of the series entirely.

“The safety and wellbeing of our cast and crew are of paramount importance,” a CBS spokesperson said in a brief statement. “We take all allegations of misconduct very seriously.”

Filming on Matlock is expected to continue without Del Rio while producers assess how to move forward with upcoming episodes.

Industry Reaction and Public Response

The news of Del Rio’s firing has sparked widespread discussion across social media. Fans of the series expressed disappointment and disbelief, with many urging for a fair investigation while others praised CBS for taking decisive action.

On X (formerly Twitter), reactions ranged from shock to frustration. One user wrote, “This is heartbreaking — I loved David’s role on Matlock, but justice and accountability must always come first.” Another added, “Hollywood has learned from the past. Quick and transparent action is the right move.”

The case also reignites conversations about the persistence of sexual misconduct within the entertainment industry, even as studios continue to adopt stricter safeguards and reporting mechanisms.

A Troubling Trend in Hollywood

Del Rio’s removal is the latest in a growing list of high-profile cases where allegations of misconduct have derailed careers and disrupted productions. In recent years, networks and streaming platforms have increased efforts to foster safer work environments through independent hotlines, HR training, and more stringent contract clauses.

Legal expert Lisa Bloom told Daily Global Diary that “networks now operate with a greater sense of responsibility and speed. Once an allegation arises, internal investigations move swiftly to protect both the accuser and the integrity of the workplace.”

While investigations continue, CBS and the show’s producers have declined to reveal whether the alleged victim remains involved with the production.

The Road Ahead for ‘Matlock’

Despite the controversy, CBS is moving forward with production. Insiders note that the show’s creative team is rewriting certain scenes to account for Del Rio’s sudden absence, and discussions are underway about a possible replacement actor if the character remains part of the narrative.

Meanwhile, fans are left wondering how this incident will impact the future of the reboot, which had been seen as one of CBS’s more promising fall offerings.

“We’re deeply disappointed, but our focus remains on supporting those affected,” a production insider told Deadline.

The story remains developing, with more updates expected as the investigation unfolds. Until then, David Del Rio’s future in television remains uncertain, and the industry once again finds itself confronting the consequences of misconduct behind the camera.

What was once one of Hollywood’s most celebrated romances continues to unravel in public view. Angelina Jolie has opened up about what she calls an “extremely painful” chapter in her life — her ongoing legal battle with ex-husband Brad Pitt.

According to new court filings obtained by USA Today on Oct. 9, Jolie has requested more than $33,000 in legal fees from Pitt amid their continuing dispute in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. The filing reportedly references a deeply personal and “traumatic period” following the couple’s 2016 divorce, which stemmed from allegations of a violent incident aboard a private plane.

“It was an extremely painful and traumatic period,” Jolie’s filing states, noting that Pitt’s latest legal maneuvers have only added to her distress.

ALSO READ : Travis Kelce Net Worth 2025 Revealed How the NFL Superstar and Taylor Swift’s Boyfriend Built His Million Dollar Empire

Inside the Legal Battle

The new filings center around Pitt’s motion to dismiss Jolie’s request for access to his private communications. These include text messages and emails connected to the infamous 2016 family flight, where Jolie claims Pitt physically assaulted both her and their children.

Pitt’s legal team reportedly argued that some of Jolie’s requested communications were “protected,” while also pushing to compel Jolie to release her own emails and legal strategy documents — something her team calls a violation of attorney-client privilege.

In her filing, Jolie emphasized that she always intended those exchanges with her legal counsel to remain confidential.

“It was an extremely painful and traumatic period,” Jolie’s filing states, noting that Pitt’s latest legal maneuvers have only added to her distress.

Jolie’s Attorney Fires Back

In a statement to USA Today, Jolie’s attorney Paul Murphy sharply criticized Pitt’s latest move, describing it as an attempt to exert control rather than pursue justice.

“Mr. Pitt’s motion is without any legal basis and the latest manifestation of his efforts to control Angelina,” Murphy said. “He is now seeking to invade her attorney-client privilege with her legal team. We expect the Court will see right through this and deny his motion.”

Murphy also noted that Jolie’s pursuit of reimbursement for her legal fees — approximately $33,000 — is standard in cases where one party believes the other has unnecessarily prolonged proceedings.

Neither Pitt nor his representatives have publicly commented on the new filing.

A Battle Beyond the Divorce

The fallout between Jolie and Pitt extends far beyond custody or divorce settlements. The two have also been locked in a bitter legal dispute over Château Miraval — the French winery they once co-owned. Jolie sold her stake in the business in 2021, prompting Pitt to file a lawsuit alleging she did so without his consent. Jolie, in turn, claimed that Pitt had tried to force her to sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) that would silence her about the 2016 incident — something she described as “extremely painful.”

That NDA, according to Jolie, became a breaking point. Sources close to her told The Guardian earlier this year that she viewed it as an attempt to “bury the truth” and maintain Pitt’s public image.

“For Angelina, it was about principle,” a source told Daily Global Diary. “She didn’t want to be silenced — not about what happened to her, and not about what happened to her kids.”

A Timeline of Turmoil

The couple, who met on the set of Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2005), married in 2014 after nearly a decade together. They share six children — Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, and twins Knox and Vivienne — and have spent much of the past eight years negotiating custody and financial disputes.

Jolie first filed for divorce in September 2016, citing “irreconcilable differences.” Since then, the once-golden couple’s private struggles have become public, marked by legal filings, property battles, and accusations that have tarnished what was once a fairy-tale Hollywood union.

While Pitt has denied all allegations of abuse, the FBI and Department of Justice reportedly investigated the 2016 plane incident but did not file charges.

Public Reaction: Sympathy and Fatigue

The ongoing saga between Jolie and Pitt continues to divide fans. On X (formerly Twitter), many have expressed sympathy for Jolie, commending her for her resilience and transparency. Others argue that the years-long court battle has dragged on too long, urging both sides to seek closure.Entertainment attorney Lisa Bloom told Daily Global Diary that “celebrity divorces of this magnitude rarely find quiet endings because the reputational stakes are so high.”

She added: “What’s unique here is how personal and painful the legal filings have become. It’s not just about property or money — it’s about control, privacy, and legacy.”

A Painful Chapter Still Unfolding

Even as both actors pursue new professional projects — Jolie’s humanitarian work through the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation and Pitt’s production ventures through Plan B Entertainment — the shadow of their marriage continues to loom.

For Jolie, the latest filings suggest she’s determined to defend her privacy — and her truth — no matter how long it takes.

“She’s not looking for attention,” a source close to Jolie said. “She’s looking for accountability.”