Entertainment
Australia’s Environment Laws Are ‘Broken Beyond Repair’: 7 Alarming Reasons Ken Henry Says It’s Time to Act
Former Treasury Secretary Ken Henry warns that Australia’s failure to reform its environment laws is endangering both nature and national productivity — and demands immediate change.
Australia’s Environment Laws Are ‘Broken Beyond Repair’: 7 Alarming Reasons Ken Henry Says It’s Time to Act
In a fiery and deeply urgent speech at the National Press Club, former Treasury Secretary Ken Henry delivered a stern warning to Australian lawmakers: the nation’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) has “patently failed” — and if not reformed now, it could lead to irreversible damage to Australia’s natural world and economy.
Speaking as the chair of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation (ACBF), Dr. Henry argued passionately that the time for consultation and delay is over. “We are passing to future generations a legacy of decades of unsustainable plunder,” he said. “We have turned nature against us.”
The Focus Keyword: Australia Environment Laws
Australia’s environment laws — once touted as comprehensive — are now under fire for being outdated, unproductive, and ineffective. Dr. Henry emphasized that Australia’s environment laws have failed in their core mission: to protect biodiversity and halt environmental degradation.

“The EPBC Act has done little more than record the degradation of the natural world, one project at a time,” he said.
1. A Broken System Failing Nature
Since its inception, the EPBC Act has been subject to three major reform attempts — none of which succeeded. According to Henry, the law is no longer fit-for-purpose. Independent reviews confirm that it does not halt deforestation, does not protect endangered species like the koala or greater glider, and certainly does not support the transition to net-zero emissions.
2. Biodiversity in Freefall
Citing the National State of the Environment Report, Henry described Australia’s ecological condition as one of “systemic decline.” He pointed to continued forest clearings—averaging 400,000 hectares annually between 2015 and 2019—as evidence of the nation’s environmental negligence.
“Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring is happening here in Australia,” he declared.
3. Environmental Damage is an Economic Threat
Ken Henry, once the top economic advisor to the Australian government, didn’t mince words: “Our failure to recognize the laws of nature is now impacting productivity.” He stressed that degradation of ecosystems threatens food security, clean air and water, and critical infrastructure—making environmental protection an economic imperative.
4. Endless Consultation, Zero Reform
Despite years of reports, political pledges, and bipartisan acknowledgment of the law’s failures, no major reform has been implemented.
“There have been endless rounds of consultation. But the laws haven’t moved an inch,” Henry lamented.
5. A Blueprint for Real Reform Exists
In 2020, the Graeme Samuel Review made 38 recommendations to modernize the EPBC Act. These included removing carve-outs, creating enforceable National Environmental Standards, and adopting a landscape-based approach to development assessments.
Both industry and environmental groups backed Samuel’s findings — a rare moment of national unity — yet Parliament has failed to act.
6. Regional Planning is the Future
Henry criticized the “nuts” logic of applying sustainability principles project-by-project. He proposed that environmental policy shift toward a region-by-region model, where entire ecosystems are evaluated and planned with a long-term, sustainable vision in mind.
7. Economics Must Respect Natural Law
Perhaps the most damning insight came in Henry’s reflection on modern economics: “For the most part, economics has ignored the most important constraints on human choices — the laws of nature.”
He argued that future productivity growth depends on embedding these constraints into legal structures, starting with enforceable National Environmental Standards.
What’s Next?
With Parliament yet again at a crossroads, Ken Henry’s challenge to policymakers is clear and forceful: “We’ve had all the reviews we need. All of us have had our say. Now get it done.”
As Daily Global Diary continues to report on Australia’s environmental future, the question remains: Will this be the moment lawmakers finally listen to science, economics, and the public?
If not, the cost may be one Australia can no longer afford to pay — not in money, but in vanishing species, rising temperatures, lost forests, and broken ecosystems.
Read more stories like this in our Environment section on Daily Global Diary.
Entertainment
How ‘Avengers: Endgame’ Returned to Cinemas and Reclaimed Box Office Glory
Renewed ticket sales send Marvel’s 2019 finale past ‘Avatar’ to lead the all-time global chart again.
Seven years after its original release, Avengers: Endgame has unfinished business at the box office.
The Marvel Studios blockbuster has overtaken James Cameron’s Avatar to become the highest-grossing film worldwide once again. According to The Walt Disney Company’s October 4 announcement, Endgame now holds an estimated $2.9255 billion, narrowly ahead of Avatar’s $2.9237 billion. That puts just $1.8 million between two of cinema’s biggest hits.
The lead is small. The comeback, however, is substantial: a film released in 2019 has drawn enough fresh ticket sales to rewrite the all-time chart.
The ‘Encore’ release that tipped the balance
The latest theatrical run, titled Avengers Endgame: Encore, has earned $126 million worldwide, according to TheWrap. That includes $36.2 million in North America and $89.8 million from international markets—the extra business that pushed the film back into first place.
Audiences also had a reason to return beyond revisiting a familiar blockbuster. TheWrap reports that the reissue features a modified ending and three new scenes during and after the credits, connected to Avengers: Doomsday. The release therefore serves two purposes: bringing an established favourite back to cinemas and giving viewers a bridge to the next Avengers story.
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A rivalry with a history of reversals
This is another change of leadership in a box office contest that has lasted for years.
Endgame first displaced Avatar in 2019. Cameron’s science-fiction epic regained the crown following its Chinese re-release in 2021. Now, another theatrical return has swung the result in Marvel’s favour. Re-releases have become a decisive part of the competition, extending both films’ earning lives well beyond their original runs.

The distinction matters: this is the record for worldwide theatrical revenue without adjustment for inflation, including re-release earnings. It measures money collected rather than the number of tickets sold.
Why ‘Endgame’ matters to ‘Doomsday’
The timing gives Marvel’s comeback an added significance. Avengers: Doomsday is scheduled to reach cinemas on December 18, 2026, and Disney has positioned Endgame as an important foundation for that next chapter.
Explaining the connection, Anthony Russo said: “You really need to pick the story up from where you left it in Endgame.”
That makes this return more than a victory lap. A film remembered for closing a major chapter of Marvel’s story is now helping introduce the next one—and, along the way, has taken back Hollywood’s most closely watched box office title.
Entertainment
Tom Cruise’s ‘Digger’ Faces a Tough Opening: Could ‘Verity’ Take the Lead?
Cruise’s star power meets a fresh box office challenge as the Colleen Hoover adaptation emerges as a formidable rival.
Tom Cruise has spent years persuading audiences to watch him attempt the impossible. With Digger, the challenge is different: convincing moviegoers to embrace an eccentric, darkly comic character who bears little resemblance to his familiar action heroes.
Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu, the film arrives in US cinemas on October 2, 2026, carrying considerable expectations. Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, an oil tycoon confronting a catastrophe connected to his company’s actions. It is a conspicuous departure for an actor whose recent screen identity has been shaped by spectacular stunts and blockbuster franchises.
Yet the conversation before release has increasingly turned from Cruise’s transformation to a more uncomfortable question: how many people will buy a ticket?
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A costly film facing a modest opening
According to Koimoi’s September 30 report, Digger was tracking for a North American opening below $15 million, against a reported production cost of approximately $125 million. These are reported estimates, rather than confirmed earnings or a final accounting of the film’s costs.
That gap explains the concern surrounding Warner Bros.. An expensive production needs sustained attendance, and a subdued debut would place greater pressure on subsequent weekends and overseas markets.
An opening forecast cannot establish a film’s eventual profit or loss. It can, however, reveal how much work remains for the campaign.
Reviews have complicated the pitch
The critical response has been sharply divided. People reported reactions ranging from admiration for the film’s audacity and Cruise’s commitment to criticism of its scale, coherence and tone.
For potential ticket buyers, that creates an uncertain proposition. Cruise’s presence attracts attention, but attention does not automatically translate into enthusiasm for an unfamiliar kind of film.

The promotional campaign has leaned into that disagreement. The Guardian described advertising that places harsh reactions alongside praise, using the controversy itself to generate interest. Whether that approach encourages curiosity or deepens hesitation remains an open question.
Why ‘Verity’ makes the weekend more intriguing
The Hollywood Reporter expects Digger to open substantially behind Verity, the Amazon MGM Studios adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel. hollywoodreporter.com
Starring Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett, Verity is also scheduled to open on October 2. Its psychological-thriller premise centres on a writer who discovers a disturbing manuscript while completing another author’s book series.
From a marketing perspective, an established novel and a recognisable thriller setup could offer a more immediate hook. Digger, by comparison, asks audiences to take a greater leap into unfamiliar territory.
The audience verdict is still ahead
Cruise has clearly committed to that leap. At the London premiere, Reuters reported that his transformation involved prosthetics and a padded bodysuit, alongside a demanding performance.
The commercial outcome remains unresolved. Strong audience recommendations could give Digger momentum beyond its initial forecasts. A weak response would make its financial challenge harder.
For now, the film’s biggest suspense lies beyond the screen: whether curiosity about Cruise’s unusual gamble becomes an opening-weekend ticket purchase.
Entertainment
‘Verity’ Could Outopen ‘Digger’: Why Tom Cruise Faces a Tough Contest
The competing releases raise a compelling question: which film will persuade more audiences to buy a ticket?
Tom Cruise has spent years persuading audiences to watch him attempt the impossible. With Digger, the challenge is different: convincing moviegoers to embrace an eccentric, darkly comic character who bears little resemblance to his familiar action heroes.
Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu, the film arrives in US cinemas on October 2, 2026, carrying considerable expectations. Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, an oil tycoon confronting a catastrophe connected to his company’s actions. It is a conspicuous departure for an actor whose recent screen identity has been shaped by spectacular stunts and blockbuster franchises.
Yet the conversation before release has increasingly turned from Cruise’s transformation to a more uncomfortable question: how many people will buy a ticket?
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A costly film facing a modest opening
According to Koimoi’s September 30 report, Digger was tracking for a North American opening below $15 million, against a reported production cost of approximately $125 million. These are reported estimates, rather than confirmed earnings or a final accounting of the film’s costs.
That gap explains the concern surrounding Warner Bros.. An expensive production needs sustained attendance, and a subdued debut would place greater pressure on subsequent weekends and overseas markets.
An opening forecast cannot establish a film’s eventual profit or loss. It can, however, reveal how much work remains for the campaign.
Reviews have complicated the pitch
The critical response has been sharply divided. People reported reactions ranging from admiration for the film’s audacity and Cruise’s commitment to criticism of its scale, coherence and tone.
For potential ticket buyers, that creates an uncertain proposition. Cruise’s presence attracts attention, but attention does not automatically translate into enthusiasm for an unfamiliar kind of film.

The promotional campaign has leaned into that disagreement. The Guardian described advertising that places harsh reactions alongside praise, using the controversy itself to generate interest. Whether that approach encourages curiosity or deepens hesitation remains an open question.
Why ‘Verity’ makes the weekend more intriguing
The Hollywood Reporter expects Digger to open substantially behind Verity, the Amazon MGM Studios adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel. hollywoodreporter.com
Starring Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett, Verity is also scheduled to open on October 2. Its psychological-thriller premise centres on a writer who discovers a disturbing manuscript while completing another author’s book series.
From a marketing perspective, an established novel and a recognisable thriller setup could offer a more immediate hook. Digger, by comparison, asks audiences to take a greater leap into unfamiliar territory.
The audience verdict is still ahead
Cruise has clearly committed to that leap. At the London premiere, Reuters reported that his transformation involved prosthetics and a padded bodysuit, alongside a demanding performance.
The commercial outcome remains unresolved. Strong audience recommendations could give Digger momentum beyond its initial forecasts. A weak response would make its financial challenge harder.
For now, the film’s biggest suspense lies beyond the screen: whether curiosity about Cruise’s unusual gamble becomes an opening-weekend ticket purchase.
-
Entertainment1 week agoMark Zuckerberg Faces a New Hollywood Reckoning Why Aaron Sorkin’s Film Hits Closer to Home
-
Entertainment1 week agoHow ‘Avengers: Endgame’ Returned to Cinemas and Reclaimed Box Office Glory
-
Entertainment1 week ago‘Avengers: Endgame’ Makes Box Office History Again With Cinema Comeback
-
Entertainment1 week agoThe Unexpected Dating Challenge Emmy Rossum Faced During Shameless
-
Entertainment1 week agoSorkin’s return to the subject connects a familiar Hollywood story with the continuing debate over technology’s influence.
-
Entertainment1 week agoFrom Amazon to Neon: The Fight to Bring ‘Artificial’ to Audiences
-
Entertainment1 week agoMike Flanagan’s ‘Carrie’ Takes on a Classic: Is Bigger Really Better?
-
Entertainment1 week ago‘Verity’ Could Outopen ‘Digger’: Why Tom Cruise Faces a Tough Contest
