Entertainment
Kyle Sandilands calls Brendan Fevola a ‘fat toad’ while defending Snoop Dogg’s AFL Grand Final show
Radio king Kyle Sandilands slammed ex-AFL star Brendan Fevola for urging the league to cancel rapper Snoop Dogg’s Grand Final performance, calling the debate “a joke”.
Table of Contents
The drama surrounding the AFL Grand Final entertainment has taken another twist after outspoken radio host Kyle Sandilands lashed out at former footballer Brendan Fevola for suggesting that Snoop Dogg should be dropped from the pre-game concert.
Fevola, a celebrated but often controversial ex-Carlton forward, predicted earlier this week on his 101.9 The Fox radio program that the AFL would axe Snoop Dogg over the rapper’s controversial lyrics and recent podcast remarks. Speaking with co-hosts Fifi Box and Nick Cody, Fevola insisted:
“I think he will get the arse … they’re going to go for an Aussie artist to play at the MCG. That’s what should happen.”
Fevola argued that the league could not justify suspending star player Izak Rankine for a homophobic slur while simultaneously paying Snoop Dogg to headline, given that some of the rapper’s songs feature the same derogatory terms. The AFL, already under fire for its handling of inclusivity and player discipline, now faces accusations of hypocrisy.

Sandilands hits back
On The Kyle and Jackie O Show, Sandilands fired back with a trademark no-holds-barred rant. He reminded listeners that Snoop Dogg’s controversial themes have been public knowledge for decades.
“Snoop’s written about pimping out women like wh**es his whole life, taking drugs, gang bangs, like yeah. You (the AFL) knew who you were hiring. Don’t go pretending,” Sandilands snapped.
The radio king then turned his fire on Fevola personally, describing him as “some sweaty ex-footballer” and going further to call him a “fat little toad.”
Sandilands mocked the suggestion that family-friendly Aussie bands like Powderfinger should replace Snoop Dogg, dismissing the idea as “a joke.”
A PR nightmare for the AFL
The AFL’s entertainment choices often draw scrutiny, but this controversy comes at a particularly sensitive moment. Just days ago, the league was accused of mishandling Izak Rankine’s suspension, sparking outrage among fans, commentators, and advocacy groups.

By booking Snoop Dogg—an artist known for pushing boundaries—the AFL attempted to secure global star power at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. Instead, the move has created a firestorm that many see as self-inflicted.
Critics argue that if the AFL enforces strict penalties on players for offensive language, it cannot simultaneously profit from artists whose lyrics normalize the same slurs. Supporters of Snoop, however, argue that the rapper’s decades-long persona is well known, and the league knowingly signed up for controversy.
Snoop Dogg’s podcast remarks add fuel
The situation escalated when clips resurfaced of Snoop Dogg’s appearance on the It’s Giving Podcast. In the interview, he recalled being caught off-guard by a scene in the Pixar film Lightyear, where two female characters raise a child together.
According to Snoop, his grandson innocently asked, “Papa Snoop, how’d she have a baby with a woman?”
The rapper admitted he struggled to respond, saying:
“I didn’t come in for this, I just came to watch the goddamn movie … I’m scared to go to the movies now, like y’all throwing me in the middle of s*** that I don’t have an answer for.”
These comments, seen by some as dismissive of LGBTQ+ families, ignited outrage, further complicating his AFL booking.
Fevola doubles down
Fevola, who has often spoken candidly about his own struggles with mental health and gambling, said he believes Snoop Dogg’s performance is untenable for a league attempting to project inclusivity.

“Because of his lyrics … he will get the (arse), which he should,” Fevola told listeners.
While his prediction that the AFL will replace Snoop Dogg with an Australian act remains unconfirmed, insiders suggest the league is under immense pressure to reassess its entertainment plans.
Sandilands refuses to budge
Sandilands, however, sees Fevola’s stance as grandstanding. He argued that Australian football fans know what to expect from a Snoop Dogg show, and that censoring the performance would be hypocritical.
“Why should this fat little toad think Snoop should be banned? It’s football, you gronks,” he thundered.
For Sandilands, the debate is not about morality but consistency. “If you’re shocked now, you were always going to be shocked,” he said.
What’s next for the AFL?
As the countdown to the Grand Final continues, the AFL finds itself trapped between two narratives: one demanding it stand firm on inclusivity, the other accusing it of selective outrage.
If Snoop Dogg is dropped, it may be seen as caving under pressure. If he stays, critics will accuse the league of hypocrisy. Either way, the controversy ensures that the AFL Grand Final will be remembered not just for the football, but for a cultural clash over music, morality, and public image.
For now, fans and commentators are left waiting to see if Fevola’s prediction comes true. Will Snoop Dogg still walk onto the MCG stage—or will the AFL opt for a safer, local alternative?
Visit our site for more news www.DailyGlobalDiary.com.
Entertainment
How ‘Avengers: Endgame’ Returned to Cinemas and Reclaimed Box Office Glory
Renewed ticket sales send Marvel’s 2019 finale past ‘Avatar’ to lead the all-time global chart again.
Seven years after its original release, Avengers: Endgame has unfinished business at the box office.
The Marvel Studios blockbuster has overtaken James Cameron’s Avatar to become the highest-grossing film worldwide once again. According to The Walt Disney Company’s October 4 announcement, Endgame now holds an estimated $2.9255 billion, narrowly ahead of Avatar’s $2.9237 billion. That puts just $1.8 million between two of cinema’s biggest hits.
The lead is small. The comeback, however, is substantial: a film released in 2019 has drawn enough fresh ticket sales to rewrite the all-time chart.
The ‘Encore’ release that tipped the balance
The latest theatrical run, titled Avengers Endgame: Encore, has earned $126 million worldwide, according to TheWrap. That includes $36.2 million in North America and $89.8 million from international markets—the extra business that pushed the film back into first place.
Audiences also had a reason to return beyond revisiting a familiar blockbuster. TheWrap reports that the reissue features a modified ending and three new scenes during and after the credits, connected to Avengers: Doomsday. The release therefore serves two purposes: bringing an established favourite back to cinemas and giving viewers a bridge to the next Avengers story.
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A rivalry with a history of reversals
This is another change of leadership in a box office contest that has lasted for years.
Endgame first displaced Avatar in 2019. Cameron’s science-fiction epic regained the crown following its Chinese re-release in 2021. Now, another theatrical return has swung the result in Marvel’s favour. Re-releases have become a decisive part of the competition, extending both films’ earning lives well beyond their original runs.

The distinction matters: this is the record for worldwide theatrical revenue without adjustment for inflation, including re-release earnings. It measures money collected rather than the number of tickets sold.
Why ‘Endgame’ matters to ‘Doomsday’
The timing gives Marvel’s comeback an added significance. Avengers: Doomsday is scheduled to reach cinemas on December 18, 2026, and Disney has positioned Endgame as an important foundation for that next chapter.
Explaining the connection, Anthony Russo said: “You really need to pick the story up from where you left it in Endgame.”
That makes this return more than a victory lap. A film remembered for closing a major chapter of Marvel’s story is now helping introduce the next one—and, along the way, has taken back Hollywood’s most closely watched box office title.
Entertainment
Tom Cruise’s ‘Digger’ Faces a Tough Opening: Could ‘Verity’ Take the Lead?
Cruise’s star power meets a fresh box office challenge as the Colleen Hoover adaptation emerges as a formidable rival.
Tom Cruise has spent years persuading audiences to watch him attempt the impossible. With Digger, the challenge is different: convincing moviegoers to embrace an eccentric, darkly comic character who bears little resemblance to his familiar action heroes.
Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu, the film arrives in US cinemas on October 2, 2026, carrying considerable expectations. Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, an oil tycoon confronting a catastrophe connected to his company’s actions. It is a conspicuous departure for an actor whose recent screen identity has been shaped by spectacular stunts and blockbuster franchises.
Yet the conversation before release has increasingly turned from Cruise’s transformation to a more uncomfortable question: how many people will buy a ticket?
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A costly film facing a modest opening
According to Koimoi’s September 30 report, Digger was tracking for a North American opening below $15 million, against a reported production cost of approximately $125 million. These are reported estimates, rather than confirmed earnings or a final accounting of the film’s costs.
That gap explains the concern surrounding Warner Bros.. An expensive production needs sustained attendance, and a subdued debut would place greater pressure on subsequent weekends and overseas markets.
An opening forecast cannot establish a film’s eventual profit or loss. It can, however, reveal how much work remains for the campaign.
Reviews have complicated the pitch
The critical response has been sharply divided. People reported reactions ranging from admiration for the film’s audacity and Cruise’s commitment to criticism of its scale, coherence and tone.
For potential ticket buyers, that creates an uncertain proposition. Cruise’s presence attracts attention, but attention does not automatically translate into enthusiasm for an unfamiliar kind of film.

The promotional campaign has leaned into that disagreement. The Guardian described advertising that places harsh reactions alongside praise, using the controversy itself to generate interest. Whether that approach encourages curiosity or deepens hesitation remains an open question.
Why ‘Verity’ makes the weekend more intriguing
The Hollywood Reporter expects Digger to open substantially behind Verity, the Amazon MGM Studios adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel. hollywoodreporter.com
Starring Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett, Verity is also scheduled to open on October 2. Its psychological-thriller premise centres on a writer who discovers a disturbing manuscript while completing another author’s book series.
From a marketing perspective, an established novel and a recognisable thriller setup could offer a more immediate hook. Digger, by comparison, asks audiences to take a greater leap into unfamiliar territory.
The audience verdict is still ahead
Cruise has clearly committed to that leap. At the London premiere, Reuters reported that his transformation involved prosthetics and a padded bodysuit, alongside a demanding performance.
The commercial outcome remains unresolved. Strong audience recommendations could give Digger momentum beyond its initial forecasts. A weak response would make its financial challenge harder.
For now, the film’s biggest suspense lies beyond the screen: whether curiosity about Cruise’s unusual gamble becomes an opening-weekend ticket purchase.
Entertainment
‘Verity’ Could Outopen ‘Digger’: Why Tom Cruise Faces a Tough Contest
The competing releases raise a compelling question: which film will persuade more audiences to buy a ticket?
Tom Cruise has spent years persuading audiences to watch him attempt the impossible. With Digger, the challenge is different: convincing moviegoers to embrace an eccentric, darkly comic character who bears little resemblance to his familiar action heroes.
Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu, the film arrives in US cinemas on October 2, 2026, carrying considerable expectations. Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, an oil tycoon confronting a catastrophe connected to his company’s actions. It is a conspicuous departure for an actor whose recent screen identity has been shaped by spectacular stunts and blockbuster franchises.
Yet the conversation before release has increasingly turned from Cruise’s transformation to a more uncomfortable question: how many people will buy a ticket?
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A costly film facing a modest opening
According to Koimoi’s September 30 report, Digger was tracking for a North American opening below $15 million, against a reported production cost of approximately $125 million. These are reported estimates, rather than confirmed earnings or a final accounting of the film’s costs.
That gap explains the concern surrounding Warner Bros.. An expensive production needs sustained attendance, and a subdued debut would place greater pressure on subsequent weekends and overseas markets.
An opening forecast cannot establish a film’s eventual profit or loss. It can, however, reveal how much work remains for the campaign.
Reviews have complicated the pitch
The critical response has been sharply divided. People reported reactions ranging from admiration for the film’s audacity and Cruise’s commitment to criticism of its scale, coherence and tone.
For potential ticket buyers, that creates an uncertain proposition. Cruise’s presence attracts attention, but attention does not automatically translate into enthusiasm for an unfamiliar kind of film.

The promotional campaign has leaned into that disagreement. The Guardian described advertising that places harsh reactions alongside praise, using the controversy itself to generate interest. Whether that approach encourages curiosity or deepens hesitation remains an open question.
Why ‘Verity’ makes the weekend more intriguing
The Hollywood Reporter expects Digger to open substantially behind Verity, the Amazon MGM Studios adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel. hollywoodreporter.com
Starring Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett, Verity is also scheduled to open on October 2. Its psychological-thriller premise centres on a writer who discovers a disturbing manuscript while completing another author’s book series.
From a marketing perspective, an established novel and a recognisable thriller setup could offer a more immediate hook. Digger, by comparison, asks audiences to take a greater leap into unfamiliar territory.
The audience verdict is still ahead
Cruise has clearly committed to that leap. At the London premiere, Reuters reported that his transformation involved prosthetics and a padded bodysuit, alongside a demanding performance.
The commercial outcome remains unresolved. Strong audience recommendations could give Digger momentum beyond its initial forecasts. A weak response would make its financial challenge harder.
For now, the film’s biggest suspense lies beyond the screen: whether curiosity about Cruise’s unusual gamble becomes an opening-weekend ticket purchase.
