Entertainment
Angelina Jolie Calls Brad Pitt’s NDA Demand ‘Extremely Painful’ — Reveals New Details from Their Legal Battle
Nearly eight years after their split, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s legal battle continues to escalate, with Jolie describing the ordeal as “traumatic” and seeking $33,000 in legal fees.
What was once one of Hollywood’s most celebrated romances continues to unravel in public view. Angelina Jolie has opened up about what she calls an “extremely painful” chapter in her life — her ongoing legal battle with ex-husband Brad Pitt.
According to new court filings obtained by USA Today on Oct. 9, Jolie has requested more than $33,000 in legal fees from Pitt amid their continuing dispute in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. The filing reportedly references a deeply personal and “traumatic period” following the couple’s 2016 divorce, which stemmed from allegations of a violent incident aboard a private plane.
“It was an extremely painful and traumatic period,” Jolie’s filing states, noting that Pitt’s latest legal maneuvers have only added to her distress.
ALSO READ : Travis Kelce Net Worth 2025 Revealed How the NFL Superstar and Taylor Swift’s Boyfriend Built His Million Dollar Empire
Inside the Legal Battle
The new filings center around Pitt’s motion to dismiss Jolie’s request for access to his private communications. These include text messages and emails connected to the infamous 2016 family flight, where Jolie claims Pitt physically assaulted both her and their children.
Pitt’s legal team reportedly argued that some of Jolie’s requested communications were “protected,” while also pushing to compel Jolie to release her own emails and legal strategy documents — something her team calls a violation of attorney-client privilege.
In her filing, Jolie emphasized that she always intended those exchanges with her legal counsel to remain confidential.
“It was an extremely painful and traumatic period,” Jolie’s filing states, noting that Pitt’s latest legal maneuvers have only added to her distress.
Jolie’s Attorney Fires Back
In a statement to USA Today, Jolie’s attorney Paul Murphy sharply criticized Pitt’s latest move, describing it as an attempt to exert control rather than pursue justice.
“Mr. Pitt’s motion is without any legal basis and the latest manifestation of his efforts to control Angelina,” Murphy said. “He is now seeking to invade her attorney-client privilege with her legal team. We expect the Court will see right through this and deny his motion.”
Murphy also noted that Jolie’s pursuit of reimbursement for her legal fees — approximately $33,000 — is standard in cases where one party believes the other has unnecessarily prolonged proceedings.
Neither Pitt nor his representatives have publicly commented on the new filing.

A Battle Beyond the Divorce
The fallout between Jolie and Pitt extends far beyond custody or divorce settlements. The two have also been locked in a bitter legal dispute over Château Miraval — the French winery they once co-owned. Jolie sold her stake in the business in 2021, prompting Pitt to file a lawsuit alleging she did so without his consent. Jolie, in turn, claimed that Pitt had tried to force her to sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) that would silence her about the 2016 incident — something she described as “extremely painful.”
That NDA, according to Jolie, became a breaking point. Sources close to her told The Guardian earlier this year that she viewed it as an attempt to “bury the truth” and maintain Pitt’s public image.
“For Angelina, it was about principle,” a source told Daily Global Diary. “She didn’t want to be silenced — not about what happened to her, and not about what happened to her kids.”
A Timeline of Turmoil
The couple, who met on the set of Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2005), married in 2014 after nearly a decade together. They share six children — Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh, and twins Knox and Vivienne — and have spent much of the past eight years negotiating custody and financial disputes.
Jolie first filed for divorce in September 2016, citing “irreconcilable differences.” Since then, the once-golden couple’s private struggles have become public, marked by legal filings, property battles, and accusations that have tarnished what was once a fairy-tale Hollywood union.
While Pitt has denied all allegations of abuse, the FBI and Department of Justice reportedly investigated the 2016 plane incident but did not file charges.
Public Reaction: Sympathy and Fatigue
The ongoing saga between Jolie and Pitt continues to divide fans. On X (formerly Twitter), many have expressed sympathy for Jolie, commending her for her resilience and transparency. Others argue that the years-long court battle has dragged on too long, urging both sides to seek closure.Entertainment attorney Lisa Bloom told Daily Global Diary that “celebrity divorces of this magnitude rarely find quiet endings because the reputational stakes are so high.”
She added: “What’s unique here is how personal and painful the legal filings have become. It’s not just about property or money — it’s about control, privacy, and legacy.”
A Painful Chapter Still Unfolding
Even as both actors pursue new professional projects — Jolie’s humanitarian work through the Maddox Jolie-Pitt Foundation and Pitt’s production ventures through Plan B Entertainment — the shadow of their marriage continues to loom.
For Jolie, the latest filings suggest she’s determined to defend her privacy — and her truth — no matter how long it takes.
“She’s not looking for attention,” a source close to Jolie said. “She’s looking for accountability.”
Entertainment
How ‘Avengers: Endgame’ Returned to Cinemas and Reclaimed Box Office Glory
Renewed ticket sales send Marvel’s 2019 finale past ‘Avatar’ to lead the all-time global chart again.
Seven years after its original release, Avengers: Endgame has unfinished business at the box office.
The Marvel Studios blockbuster has overtaken James Cameron’s Avatar to become the highest-grossing film worldwide once again. According to The Walt Disney Company’s October 4 announcement, Endgame now holds an estimated $2.9255 billion, narrowly ahead of Avatar’s $2.9237 billion. That puts just $1.8 million between two of cinema’s biggest hits.
The lead is small. The comeback, however, is substantial: a film released in 2019 has drawn enough fresh ticket sales to rewrite the all-time chart.
The ‘Encore’ release that tipped the balance
The latest theatrical run, titled Avengers Endgame: Encore, has earned $126 million worldwide, according to TheWrap. That includes $36.2 million in North America and $89.8 million from international markets—the extra business that pushed the film back into first place.
Audiences also had a reason to return beyond revisiting a familiar blockbuster. TheWrap reports that the reissue features a modified ending and three new scenes during and after the credits, connected to Avengers: Doomsday. The release therefore serves two purposes: bringing an established favourite back to cinemas and giving viewers a bridge to the next Avengers story.
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A rivalry with a history of reversals
This is another change of leadership in a box office contest that has lasted for years.
Endgame first displaced Avatar in 2019. Cameron’s science-fiction epic regained the crown following its Chinese re-release in 2021. Now, another theatrical return has swung the result in Marvel’s favour. Re-releases have become a decisive part of the competition, extending both films’ earning lives well beyond their original runs.

The distinction matters: this is the record for worldwide theatrical revenue without adjustment for inflation, including re-release earnings. It measures money collected rather than the number of tickets sold.
Why ‘Endgame’ matters to ‘Doomsday’
The timing gives Marvel’s comeback an added significance. Avengers: Doomsday is scheduled to reach cinemas on December 18, 2026, and Disney has positioned Endgame as an important foundation for that next chapter.
Explaining the connection, Anthony Russo said: “You really need to pick the story up from where you left it in Endgame.”
That makes this return more than a victory lap. A film remembered for closing a major chapter of Marvel’s story is now helping introduce the next one—and, along the way, has taken back Hollywood’s most closely watched box office title.
Entertainment
Tom Cruise’s ‘Digger’ Faces a Tough Opening: Could ‘Verity’ Take the Lead?
Cruise’s star power meets a fresh box office challenge as the Colleen Hoover adaptation emerges as a formidable rival.
Tom Cruise has spent years persuading audiences to watch him attempt the impossible. With Digger, the challenge is different: convincing moviegoers to embrace an eccentric, darkly comic character who bears little resemblance to his familiar action heroes.
Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu, the film arrives in US cinemas on October 2, 2026, carrying considerable expectations. Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, an oil tycoon confronting a catastrophe connected to his company’s actions. It is a conspicuous departure for an actor whose recent screen identity has been shaped by spectacular stunts and blockbuster franchises.
Yet the conversation before release has increasingly turned from Cruise’s transformation to a more uncomfortable question: how many people will buy a ticket?
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A costly film facing a modest opening
According to Koimoi’s September 30 report, Digger was tracking for a North American opening below $15 million, against a reported production cost of approximately $125 million. These are reported estimates, rather than confirmed earnings or a final accounting of the film’s costs.
That gap explains the concern surrounding Warner Bros.. An expensive production needs sustained attendance, and a subdued debut would place greater pressure on subsequent weekends and overseas markets.
An opening forecast cannot establish a film’s eventual profit or loss. It can, however, reveal how much work remains for the campaign.
Reviews have complicated the pitch
The critical response has been sharply divided. People reported reactions ranging from admiration for the film’s audacity and Cruise’s commitment to criticism of its scale, coherence and tone.
For potential ticket buyers, that creates an uncertain proposition. Cruise’s presence attracts attention, but attention does not automatically translate into enthusiasm for an unfamiliar kind of film.

The promotional campaign has leaned into that disagreement. The Guardian described advertising that places harsh reactions alongside praise, using the controversy itself to generate interest. Whether that approach encourages curiosity or deepens hesitation remains an open question.
Why ‘Verity’ makes the weekend more intriguing
The Hollywood Reporter expects Digger to open substantially behind Verity, the Amazon MGM Studios adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel. hollywoodreporter.com
Starring Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett, Verity is also scheduled to open on October 2. Its psychological-thriller premise centres on a writer who discovers a disturbing manuscript while completing another author’s book series.
From a marketing perspective, an established novel and a recognisable thriller setup could offer a more immediate hook. Digger, by comparison, asks audiences to take a greater leap into unfamiliar territory.
The audience verdict is still ahead
Cruise has clearly committed to that leap. At the London premiere, Reuters reported that his transformation involved prosthetics and a padded bodysuit, alongside a demanding performance.
The commercial outcome remains unresolved. Strong audience recommendations could give Digger momentum beyond its initial forecasts. A weak response would make its financial challenge harder.
For now, the film’s biggest suspense lies beyond the screen: whether curiosity about Cruise’s unusual gamble becomes an opening-weekend ticket purchase.
Entertainment
‘Verity’ Could Outopen ‘Digger’: Why Tom Cruise Faces a Tough Contest
The competing releases raise a compelling question: which film will persuade more audiences to buy a ticket?
Tom Cruise has spent years persuading audiences to watch him attempt the impossible. With Digger, the challenge is different: convincing moviegoers to embrace an eccentric, darkly comic character who bears little resemblance to his familiar action heroes.
Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu, the film arrives in US cinemas on October 2, 2026, carrying considerable expectations. Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, an oil tycoon confronting a catastrophe connected to his company’s actions. It is a conspicuous departure for an actor whose recent screen identity has been shaped by spectacular stunts and blockbuster franchises.
Yet the conversation before release has increasingly turned from Cruise’s transformation to a more uncomfortable question: how many people will buy a ticket?
ALSO READ : Emmy Nominations Announcement Gets a Star Twist… Liza Colón-Zayas & Jeff Hiller Set to Reveal 2026 TV Nominees
A costly film facing a modest opening
According to Koimoi’s September 30 report, Digger was tracking for a North American opening below $15 million, against a reported production cost of approximately $125 million. These are reported estimates, rather than confirmed earnings or a final accounting of the film’s costs.
That gap explains the concern surrounding Warner Bros.. An expensive production needs sustained attendance, and a subdued debut would place greater pressure on subsequent weekends and overseas markets.
An opening forecast cannot establish a film’s eventual profit or loss. It can, however, reveal how much work remains for the campaign.
Reviews have complicated the pitch
The critical response has been sharply divided. People reported reactions ranging from admiration for the film’s audacity and Cruise’s commitment to criticism of its scale, coherence and tone.
For potential ticket buyers, that creates an uncertain proposition. Cruise’s presence attracts attention, but attention does not automatically translate into enthusiasm for an unfamiliar kind of film.

The promotional campaign has leaned into that disagreement. The Guardian described advertising that places harsh reactions alongside praise, using the controversy itself to generate interest. Whether that approach encourages curiosity or deepens hesitation remains an open question.
Why ‘Verity’ makes the weekend more intriguing
The Hollywood Reporter expects Digger to open substantially behind Verity, the Amazon MGM Studios adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s novel. hollywoodreporter.com
Starring Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett, Verity is also scheduled to open on October 2. Its psychological-thriller premise centres on a writer who discovers a disturbing manuscript while completing another author’s book series.
From a marketing perspective, an established novel and a recognisable thriller setup could offer a more immediate hook. Digger, by comparison, asks audiences to take a greater leap into unfamiliar territory.
The audience verdict is still ahead
Cruise has clearly committed to that leap. At the London premiere, Reuters reported that his transformation involved prosthetics and a padded bodysuit, alongside a demanding performance.
The commercial outcome remains unresolved. Strong audience recommendations could give Digger momentum beyond its initial forecasts. A weak response would make its financial challenge harder.
For now, the film’s biggest suspense lies beyond the screen: whether curiosity about Cruise’s unusual gamble becomes an opening-weekend ticket purchase.
