Connect with us

Politics

Supreme Court Denies Apache Appeal, Paving Way for Controversial Arizona Copper Mine

Tribal religious rights clash with mining giants’ ambitions as sacred Oak Flat faces destruction despite dissent from conservative justices

Published

on

DGD88 scaled Daily Global Diary - Authentic Global News
Oak Flat, sacred to the Apache people, faces destruction from the Resolution Copper mine, as the Supreme Court declines to hear a religious rights appeal. ( Source : Reuters )

In a ruling that has ignited nationwide debate, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear an appeal by Apache Stronghold, a Native American advocacy group, effectively allowing the controversial Resolution Copper mining project to proceed on sacred tribal land in Arizona. The decision clears a major legal obstacle for mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP, whose joint venture seeks to tap into one of the world’s largest untapped copper reserves—beneath land the Apache call Chi’chil Biłdagoteel, or Oak Flat.

At the heart of the dispute is a stark conflict between Native American religious freedom and the U.S. government’s economic and energy priorities. Oak Flat, located within Tonto National Forest about 70 miles east of Phoenix, has been used for centuries by Western Apaches for ceremonial rites including the Sunrise Ceremony and sweat lodge rituals. Apache Stronghold argued that the destruction of this sacred land would violate their First Amendment rights and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

But the justices, without offering a full opinion, refused to take up the case. Conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented sharply, with Gorsuch stating in a 17-page opinion: “Just imagine if the government sought to demolish a historic cathedral… We owe the Apaches no less.” Justice Samuel Alito, who holds financial interests in BHP, recused himself.

Despite tribal outcry and environmental concerns, mining supporters see the project as a critical asset to U.S. energy independence, particularly for copper’s role in electric vehicles, renewable energy infrastructure, and national defense. The mine could supply up to 25% of the country’s copper needs. The project was greenlit in a 2014 land swap deal signed into law under President Barack Obama, transferring federally owned Oak Flat to the mining companies in exchange for other acreage.

Local officials, like Democratic Mayor Mila Besich of Superior—the town nearest the site—celebrated the court’s inaction. “For Superior and all of Arizona, this project will be an economic boon,” she said.

But Apache leaders and their allies say the fight is far from over. Wendsler Nosie Sr. of Apache Stronghold issued a defiant statement: “While this decision is a heavy blow, our struggle is far from over. We urge Congress to take decisive action to stop this injustice while we press forward in the courts.”

Legal experts say the case also reveals a troubling inconsistency in how the court treats religious liberty claims. The current conservative majority has frequently ruled in favor of Christian plaintiffs in recent years. Yet in this instance—despite centuries-old tribal ties to the land and a treaty dating back to 1852—the court sided with federal land rights and corporate interests.

Resolution Copper and its general manager, Vicky Peacey, defended the project’s legitimacy, stating that “extensive consultation” with tribes had already led to significant design modifications and that the “ongoing dialogue will continue to shape the project.”

However, the mine’s impact will be anything but cosmetic. Environmental reports suggest the project would result in a crater nearly two miles wide and 1,000 feet deep, effectively obliterating the sacred site. Two additional lawsuits—one filed by the San Carlos Apache Tribe and another by the Center for Biological Diversity—are still active.

As the Biden administration moves to finalize environmental assessments required for the land transfer, Congress may soon face pressure to intervene. If it does not, Resolution Copper could begin mining operations within months—over the objections of Native American communities, spiritual leaders, and environmental activists nationwide.

Politics

Inside the ‘Honoring Trump’ Dinner Party Hosted by David Ellison… What Did the Former President Speak for an Hour About?

Hollywood power circles and political influence overlapped as David Ellison reportedly hosted an intimate dinner where Donald Trump delivered extended remarks, drawing attention across media and entertainment industries.

Published

on

By

David Ellison Hosts Dinner Honoring Donald Trump; Former President Delivers Hour-Long Remarks
David Ellison reportedly hosted an exclusive dinner where Donald Trump delivered an hour-long address, drawing attention from Hollywood and political observers.

A private dinner gathering in elite Hollywood and political circles has sparked widespread discussion after reports emerged that film producer David Ellison hosted an evening “honoring” former U.S. President Donald Trump, during which Trump reportedly delivered an hour-long address to guests.

The dinner, described by attendees as an exclusive, invitation-only affair, is said to have brought together influential figures from the entertainment industry, business world, and political orbit. Ellison, who leads Skydance Media, has long been considered one of Hollywood’s most influential modern studio executives, known for his growing footprint in global film and streaming production.

A Hollywood-Politics Crossover Moment

According to accounts circulating within industry circles, the evening was framed as a “private honoring dinner,” though no formal public details were released by the host or guests. What stood out most was Trump’s extended remarks, which reportedly lasted close to an hour and covered a range of topics including leadership, media, and global affairs.

ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”

While such gatherings between entertainment executives and political figures are not entirely unusual in Los Angeles and Washington networking ecosystems, the scale and tone of this particular event have drawn heightened attention.

Trump’s Continued Presence in Elite Circles

Donald Trump, whose political and public profile remains one of the most polarizing in modern American history, continues to maintain strong visibility across business, media, and political landscapes. His appearances at private events, especially within influential industry groups, often generate public curiosity and debate.

Supporters often view such engagements as a continuation of his strong ties with high-profile business leaders, while critics question the blending of entertainment influence with political messaging in private settings.

David Ellison’s Expanding Industry Influence

For David Ellison, son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, this dinner adds another layer to his growing reputation as a key connector between Hollywood, technology, and global finance. Under his leadership, Skydance Media has become a major production force behind several high-budget films and franchise projects.

David Ellison Hosts Dinner Honoring Donald Trump; Former President Delivers Hour-Long Remarks


Industry observers note that Ellison’s network increasingly spans both entertainment and geopolitical spheres, reflecting a broader trend in Hollywood where media executives engage with political figures more directly than in previous decades.

A Private Dinner, Public Curiosity

Although the dinner itself was private, its implications are anything but. In today’s hyper-connected media environment, even closed-door gatherings between influential figures quickly become subjects of public speculation.

The combination of Hollywood leadership and a former U.S. president in the same room—especially one reportedly centered around extended political remarks—has naturally fueled discussion across media platforms.

As of now, neither Ellison nor Trump has issued detailed public statements about the nature of the dinner or the topics discussed. However, the event underscores the increasingly blurred lines between entertainment power structures and political influence.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Trump Is Killing the Climate’? Al Gore Says He Isn’t Worried… “Public Opinion Will Force the Solution”

Two decades after An Inconvenient Truth, former U.S. Vice President Al Gore remains confident that climate action is inevitable—despite political resistance and renewed global tensions over environmental policy.

Published

on

By

Al Gore Says Climate Action Is Inevitable Despite Trump Policy Influence, Cites Public Opinion
Al Gore revisits the legacy of An Inconvenient Truth, expressing confidence that public pressure will ultimately drive global climate action.

Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore has once again ignited global discussion on climate change—this time with a bold message of optimism, even as political debates intensify in Washington.

In a recent reflection tied to the legacy of his landmark documentary An Inconvenient Truth, Gore made it clear that he is not alarmed by political setbacks, including the climate policy direction associated with former President Donald Trump.

“The fact that public opinion is so strongly on the side of doing something makes it inevitable that we will solve the climate crisis,” Gore stated, reinforcing his long-held belief that public pressure—not political cycles—will ultimately drive global environmental action.

ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”

A 20-Year Legacy Still Shaping Climate Debate

When An Inconvenient Truth was released nearly two decades ago, it transformed Gore from a former presidential candidate into one of the world’s most visible climate advocates. The film played a major role in bringing global warming into mainstream political and public discourse.

Even today, environmental analysts credit the documentary for influencing climate education, corporate sustainability efforts, and international climate agreements.

Political Resistance vs Public Momentum

Despite Gore’s optimism, climate policy in the United States has remained deeply divided along political lines. The environmental rollback policies associated with the Trump administration continue to be a point of debate among scientists, policymakers, and activists.

However, Gore argues that this political friction does not reflect the broader direction of society. Instead, he believes public awareness has reached a tipping point that will eventually override political hesitation.

The Climate Debate in a New Era

Global climate discussions are now shaped by more than just government policy. Corporate commitments, youth-led climate movements, and international agreements have significantly increased pressure on governments to act.

Al Gore Says Climate Action Is Inevitable Despite Trump Policy Influence, Cites Public Opinion


Organizations like the United Nations have repeatedly warned that the window to limit global warming is narrowing, adding urgency to the conversation Gore helped popularize years ago.

Why Gore’s Confidence Matters Now

What makes Gore’s latest remarks notable is not just their optimism, but the timing. As extreme weather events intensify worldwide—from heatwaves to floods—public attention on climate issues has surged again.

Environmental experts suggest that while political leadership fluctuates, long-term public sentiment tends to move steadily toward sustainability and environmental protection.

Gore’s core argument remains unchanged: even if political resistance slows progress temporarily, societal demand will ultimately push climate solutions forward.

A Message of Long-Term Inevitability

Rather than framing climate action as dependent on any single administration, Gore continues to emphasize inevitability driven by collective awareness.

His position is clear: the climate crisis will not be solved overnight, but it will be solved because people increasingly demand action.

And in that belief, Gore sees not despair—but direction.

Continue Reading

Politics

Al Gore Breaks Silence on Trump and Climate Crisis “It’s Inevitable We’ll Solve It…” But Is That Confidence Enough?

Two decades after An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore says public opinion—not politics—will ultimately decide the fate of climate change

Published

on

By

Al Gore Says Climate Crisis Will Be Solved Despite Trump—Public Opinion Holds the Key
Al Gore speaks on climate change, expressing confidence in public-driven solutions despite political challenges.

At a time when climate debates often feel louder—and more polarized—than ever, Al Gore is choosing a surprisingly calm tone.

The former U.S. Vice President, long regarded as one of the most influential voices in global environmental advocacy, isn’t sounding alarms about political setbacks. Instead, he’s expressing something that many might find unexpected: confidence.

And not just cautious optimism—but belief in inevitability.

“We Will Solve It”—A Statement That Turns Heads

Speaking nearly two decades after the release of his groundbreaking documentary An Inconvenient Truth, Gore made it clear that he doesn’t believe the climate crisis can be derailed by any one political figure—including Donald Trump.

“The fact that public opinion is so strongly on the side of doing something makes it inevitable that we will solve the climate crisis,” Gore said—a statement that has sparked both hope and debate.

ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”

It’s a perspective rooted not in policy cycles, but in people power.

Why Gore Isn’t Focused on Politics

For years, climate discourse has often been framed through a political lens—policies passed, agreements signed, and leadership changes. But Gore’s latest remarks suggest a shift in thinking.

He’s betting on something deeper: public awareness.

From rising youth activism to increasing corporate commitments toward sustainability, there’s a growing sense that climate action is no longer a niche concern. It’s mainstream. It’s urgent. And, perhaps most importantly, it’s widely supported.

Gore believes that once public consensus reaches a tipping point, political systems will inevitably follow.

The Legacy of ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

When An Inconvenient Truth premiered in 2006, it wasn’t just a documentary—it was a wake-up call. It brought climate science into living rooms, classrooms, and conversations around the world.

At the time, the film played a critical role in shaping public understanding of global warming. Today, its legacy still lingers, especially as climate change becomes less of a prediction and more of a lived reality.

For Gore, the progress made since then is proof that awareness works.

But the question remains: Is awareness enough?

The Trump Factor—Real Threat or Temporary Setback?

Critics argue that political leadership still matters deeply, especially when it comes to environmental regulations, international agreements, and funding for climate initiatives.

During his presidency, Donald Trump took steps that many environmentalists viewed as setbacks, including withdrawing from key climate agreements and rolling back certain regulations.

Yet Gore’s stance suggests that such moves, while impactful, are not permanent barriers. In his view, they are temporary detours in a much longer journey.

It’s a perspective that reframes the conversation—not as a battle between administrations, but as a long-term global shift.

Public Opinion as the Driving Force

Perhaps the most compelling part of Gore’s argument is his faith in public opinion.

Al Gore Says Climate Crisis Will Be Solved Despite Trump—Public Opinion Holds the Key


Across the world, climate concerns are influencing elections, shaping corporate strategies, and driving grassroots movements. From renewable energy adoption to climate-conscious consumer behavior, the signs of change are everywhere.

Gore sees this as the real engine of progress.

Not politicians. Not policies alone.

People.

A Message of Hope—or Overconfidence?

While many welcome Gore’s optimism, others question whether it might underestimate the scale and urgency of the crisis. Climate change is a complex issue, influenced by economic, political, and technological factors.

Can public opinion alone accelerate the pace of change needed?

Or does it risk creating a false sense of security?

These are questions that continue to divide experts and policymakers alike.

The Bigger Picture

What’s clear, however, is that the conversation around climate change is evolving. It’s no longer just about warnings—it’s about solutions, accountability, and collective action.

Gore’s message fits into this new narrative. It’s less about fear and more about momentum.

And perhaps that’s exactly what the world needs right now—a reminder that progress, while uneven, is still possible.

Final Thought

Whether one agrees with him or not, Al Gore’s confidence is hard to ignore.

In a world often dominated by uncertainty, his belief that the climate crisis will be solved offers a rare sense of direction.

But as history has shown, inevitability doesn’t mean immediacy.

The future may be moving toward a solution—but how fast we get there still depends on what happens next.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending