Connect with us

Politics

Trump and Kennedy Spark Outrage After Linking Tylenol and Circumcision to Autism: “You Have to Tough It Out”

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former President Donald Trump have reignited controversy after warning against Tylenol use during pregnancy and infancy — despite medical experts calling their claims unproven.

Published

on

Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Link Tylenol and Circumcision to Autism — Experts Dismiss Claims
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Donald Trump during a Cabinet meeting in Washington, where they warned against Tylenol use in pregnancy — despite lack of medical evidence linking it to autism.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A new political storm is brewing in Washington after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Wikipedia) claimed that circumcised boys are twice as likely to be diagnosed with autism, linking the condition to the use of Tylenol (acetaminophen) — an assertion widely dismissed by health experts as scientifically unsubstantiated.

Kennedy made the comments during an October 9 Cabinet meeting led by former President Donald Trump (Wikipedia), further escalating their joint campaign warning pregnant women and new mothers against using Tylenol.

“There are two studies that show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism,” Kennedy said during the meeting. “It’s highly likely because they’re given Tylenol.”


Trump and Kennedy’s Unproven Health Crusade

The controversy began on September 22, when both Trump and Kennedy publicly urged pregnant women not to take Tylenol, citing what they called “alarming data” about the drug’s possible link to autism.

Trump doubled down on that message during the recent Cabinet meeting, stating bluntly:

“I would say don’t take Tylenol if you’re pregnant. And when the baby is born, don’t give it Tylenol.”

Kennedy followed up by claiming that while causation hasn’t been definitively proven, “the correlation is so strong that it would be irresponsible to ignore it.”

“It’s not dispositive that it causes autism,” Kennedy added, “but it’s so suggestive that anybody who takes the stuff during pregnancy is irresponsible.”

Their statements immediately drew sharp criticism from medical organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, both of which reaffirmed that acetaminophen remains the safest pain relief option for pregnant women when used appropriately.


Medical Experts Push Back

The pharmaceutical company Kenvue (LinkedIn), which manufactures Tylenol, swiftly issued a statement emphasizing that extensive research has found no causal link between acetaminophen use and autism.

“Studies to date show no evidence that acetaminophen use during pregnancy causes fetal developmental issues,” Kenvue said.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has similarly not issued any guidance against Tylenol for pregnant women, instead advising them to avoid ibuprofen after 20 weeks of pregnancy due to risks of fetal kidney damage.

Dr. Lisa Masterson, a California-based obstetrician and former co-host of The Doctors, told Daily Global Diary that Kennedy’s remarks are “reckless and deeply misleading.”

“Acetaminophen has been used safely for decades by millions of pregnant women,” she said. “To link it casually to autism without credible evidence risks frightening expectant mothers into unnecessary suffering.”

download 2 2 Daily Global Diary - Authentic Global News

The Circumcision-Autism Connection Claim

Kennedy’s latest assertion — tying early circumcision to autism — has particularly alarmed pediatric experts. The supposed “two studies” he cited have not been peer-reviewed in major medical journals, and researchers say correlation does not equal causation.

“Infant circumcision and autism have no scientifically proven link,” said Dr. James Andrews, a pediatric neurologist at Johns Hopkins University (Wikipedia). “This theory has been circulating in fringe online communities for years, and it’s troubling to see public officials giving it oxygen.”


Trump’s Remark: “You Have to Tough It Out”

When asked what alternatives women should use for pain relief during pregnancy if not Tylenol, Trump’s response drew even more criticism.

“You have to tough it out,” he said, before adding with a chuckle, “It’s easy for me to say.”

That comment — seen by many as dismissive of women’s pain — quickly trended on X (formerly Twitter), with hashtags like #TylenolTruth and #ToughItOutTrump gaining traction.

Political analyst Abby Phillip of CNN noted that Trump’s remarks could become a flashpoint in the 2025 election cycle, further polarizing debates over science, health policy, and misinformation.


A Familiar Pattern of Controversy

Both Kennedy and Trump have histories of questioning mainstream medical science. Kennedy, a prominent vaccine skeptic long before joining Trump’s cabinet, has faced repeated criticism from the scientific community for spreading misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines and public health guidelines.

Trump, for his part, has continued to promote unconventional and often disproven medical theories — including his widely criticized comments in 2020 about injecting disinfectant to treat COVID-19.

“When politicians start acting like doctors, people get hurt,” wrote Dr. Peter Hotez (Wikipedia), a vaccine scientist at Baylor College of Medicine, on X. “Tylenol remains safe during pregnancy. Period.”


What’s Next for the Tylenol Debate

While no formal health policy has been proposed, the Trump administration’s rhetoric could prompt renewed scrutiny of over-the-counter medications used during pregnancy.

For now, experts say the guidance remains unchanged: acetaminophen is considered safe when used in moderation and under medical supervision.

But the episode underscores a deeper concern — the growing politicization of science and health.

“It’s dangerous when leaders amplify fear instead of facts,” said Dr. Masterson. “Women deserve evidence-based care, not conspiracy-based caution.”
For more Update http://www.dailyglobaldiary.com

Politics

Donald Trump Heads to Walter Reed for Medical Exam — “Just a Routine Checkup,” Says White House

At 79, former U.S. President Donald Trump will undergo his second health evaluation of the year at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center amid reports of chronic venous insufficiency, with the White House assuring the visit is “routine and precautionary.”

Published

on

By

Israeli Government Approves Donald Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan Hostage Deal
Donald Trump waves to reporters before departing for Walter Reed Medical Center, where he will undergo a routine medical exam and meet with U.S. troops.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump is set to undergo a medical examination at Walter Reed Medical Center on Friday, October 10 — his second such checkup of the year — as part of what the White House describes as a “routine yearly evaluation.”

The visit comes just months after Trump was diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a condition that affects circulation in the legs and can cause swelling around the ankles — a common issue for individuals in their 70s.

According to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Trump’s trip to the medical center will also include a “planned meeting” with U.S. troops stationed at the facility, where he is expected to deliver brief remarks.

ALSO READ : Jonah Hill Looks Unrecognizable on Set of New Film With Kristen Wiig

“While there, President Trump will stop by for his routine yearly checkup,” Leavitt said in a statement Thursday. “He looks forward to spending time with the brave men and women serving our nation.”

A Routine Visit — But at a Critical Time

Friday’s appointment marks Trump’s second examination at Walter Reed this year, following a physical conducted on April 11. That earlier report, released by White House physician U.S. Navy Captain Sean Barbabella, concluded that the president was in “excellent health” and that his high cholesterol was “well controlled.”

Trump’s return to the facility has drawn attention not only because of his age — at 79, he remains the oldest person to begin a presidential term — but also due to his increasingly demanding schedule, both politically and diplomatically.

Leavitt added that the former president “may travel to the Middle East later in the day,” where he hopes to finalize an emerging peace deal between Israel and Hamas following recent reports of a ceasefire agreement.

“He’s balancing his health, leadership, and diplomacy all at once,” said a senior White House aide. “It’s classic Trump — never slowing down.”

Donald Trump Undergoes Routine Medical Exam at Walter Reed, Says White House | Daily Global Diary


Understanding the Diagnosis: Chronic Venous Insufficiency

Trump’s diagnosis of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in July raised mild concern among observers, though medical experts were quick to note that the condition is manageable.

According to Johns Hopkins Medicine, CVI occurs when veins in the legs struggle to return blood to the heart, often leading to swelling or discomfort. It is more common in older adults and people who spend long hours standing.

Dr. Barbabella’s team reportedly recommended lifestyle adjustments such as compression therapy and moderate exercise to support healthy circulation.]

“The president has followed all medical guidance and remains physically active,” said a source familiar with his care. “He’s in remarkably strong shape for his age.”

Trump’s Health and Public Life

The topic of Trump’s health has long intrigued both supporters and critics, given his grueling travel schedule, late-night speeches, and ongoing political commitments.

Since leaving the White House in 2021, Trump has maintained an active public life, frequently appearing at campaign-style rallies, policy roundtables, and media interviews.

Earlier this year, he made headlines after spending more than 12 hours on his feet during consecutive events across three states. “He’s got the energy of a 40-year-old,” joked a senior campaign aide.

Still, even Trump himself has occasionally acknowledged the realities of aging. “I feel great, but I listen to my doctors,” he said in a July interview on Fox News. “You can’t make America great again if you’re not taking care of yourself first.”

A President Who Won’t Slow Down

Despite his diagnosis, Trump’s circle insists he remains as active and sharp as ever. Aides say his daily schedule continues to include early-morning briefings, phone calls with advisors, and ongoing work on foreign policy initiatives.

His potential Middle East visit underscores that pace. If confirmed, it would be his second international trip this fall, following September’s high-profile visit to London for trade discussions.

“He’s always been unstoppable,” said a former Secret Service agent who served during Trump’s first term. “Even when he’s under the weather, he keeps moving — that’s who he is.”

What Comes Next

After his medical exam, Trump is expected to release a summary of results through the White House Office of the Physician, continuing his tradition of annual transparency reports.

While his doctors have described his condition as stable, medical professionals emphasize the importance of regular monitoring.

“Routine evaluations are critical for older adults in high-stress leadership roles,” said Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent. “As long as he’s following up regularly, there’s no cause for alarm.”

For now, Trump appears undeterred — viewing the exam as just another day on a packed presidential calendar.

“He’ll go in, shake a few hands, get checked up, and get right back to business,” one aide said with a grin.

And for Donald Trump, business — and politics — rarely ever stop.

Continue Reading

Politics

“Historic Day for the Middle East…” Donald Trump Announces Israel–Hamas Peace Deal, Says “The World Is Watching Something Remarkable”

“Historic Day for the Middle East…” Donald Trump Announces Israel–Hamas Peace Deal, Says “The World Is Watching Something Remarkable”

Published

on

By

Donald Trump Announces Historic Israel–Hamas Peace Deal | Daily Global Diary
Former U.S. President Donald Trump announces the Israel–Hamas peace deal during a press conference at Mar-a-Lago, calling it “a turning point for humanity.”

In a stunning geopolitical moment that few saw coming, former U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Thursday that Israel and Hamas have officially signed off on the first phase of a peace plan aimed at ending years of bloodshed and hostility in the region.

Speaking from his estate at Mar-a-Lago, Trump called the agreement “a monumental breakthrough that proves peace is always possible — even among the unlikeliest of adversaries.”

“Today, Israel and Hamas have taken the first step toward lasting peace,” Trump said during his announcement. “It’s not just a deal between two sides — it’s a message to the world that hope and diplomacy can prevail over hate and terror.”

ALSO READ : Jonah Hill Looks Unrecognizable on Set of New Film With Kristen Wiig

The First Phase: Ceasefire and Humanitarian Relief

According to preliminary details shared with the press, the initial phase of the agreement includes a comprehensive ceasefire, humanitarian corridors for aid delivery, and the establishment of a joint monitoring committee composed of representatives from both sides as well as neutral international observers.

A senior official familiar with the talks told Reuters that this stage also includes a temporary exchange of detainees and the creation of “safe zones” to allow displaced civilians to return to their homes.

The move is being hailed as the most significant peace effort since the Oslo Accords, which were signed three decades ago but ultimately collapsed amid renewed violence and mistrust.

A Legacy Move for Trump

Trump, who brokered several Middle East normalization deals during his presidency through the Abraham Accords, said he had been working “behind the scenes” with regional leaders for months to facilitate dialogue between Jerusalem and Gaza.

“This deal didn’t happen overnight,” Trump emphasized. “It required courage — from both sides — and a shared belief that war is not destiny.”

Diplomatic sources confirmed that Egypt, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia played key mediating roles, helping to bridge political and security gaps that had previously derailed similar negotiations.

“This is Trump trying to cement his foreign policy legacy beyond the Abraham Accords,” said one analyst from the Council on Foreign Relations. “If this holds, it could redefine his image from dealmaker to peacemaker.”

Global Reaction: Cautious Optimism

World leaders and international organizations reacted with cautious optimism.

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres praised the announcement, calling it “a hopeful step toward stability in a region long plagued by pain.”

However, some experts warned that implementing the deal would require unwavering commitment from both sides. “The challenge isn’t in signing a document — it’s in changing decades of mistrust,” said former diplomat Dennis Ross, who served as a Middle East peace negotiator under multiple U.S. administrations.

In Tel Aviv, reactions were mixed. Some Israeli citizens welcomed the truce, while others voiced concerns that Hamas could use the ceasefire to regroup.

Meanwhile, in Gaza City, many residents expressed relief at the prospect of quiet after months of bombardment. “All we want is to live without fear,” said one local teacher, who asked not to be named for safety reasons.

Hamas Responds: “This Is a Beginning, Not an End”

In a rare joint statement, Hamas officials confirmed their agreement to the deal, emphasizing that the group sees it as “a step toward dignity, justice, and self-determination for the Palestinian people.”

Donald Trump Announces Historic Israel–Hamas Peace Deal | Daily Global Diary


“We have agreed to give peace a chance,” a Hamas spokesperson told Al Jazeera. “But our participation depends on Israel’s willingness to respect humanitarian boundaries.”

The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office also released a statement acknowledging the accord and thanking mediators for their role, while maintaining that national security remains “non-negotiable.”

Trump’s Return to the Spotlight

The announcement comes as Trump continues to dominate American and global political conversations ahead of the 2025 landscape.

His statement on the deal echoed his trademark self-assured tone:

“Many people said peace between Israel and Hamas was impossible — I’ve always said, ‘Nothing’s impossible if you have the right people at the table.’ And today, we proved that.”

Political analysts believe the move could significantly boost Trump’s global standing and strengthen his appeal among voters who previously viewed his foreign policy as unpredictable yet effective.

“He’s positioning himself as the ultimate negotiator once again,” said political strategist David Axelrod. “Love him or hate him, Trump has a knack for making headlines that shift the global narrative.”

The Road Ahead

While the announcement is historic, experts warn that real peace will depend on the actions taken in the coming weeks. The next phases of the agreement reportedly include discussions on border management, reconstruction aid, and long-term security arrangements.

For now, both sides seem cautiously committed. As one U.N. observer noted:

“If this fragile peace holds, it could mark the beginning of a new chapter — not only for Israel and Palestine, but for the entire Middle East.”

And for Donald Trump, it could mark a return not just to political prominence — but to the global stage of history.

Continue Reading

Politics

“We Took the Freedom of Speech Away”: Donald Trump Revives Debate Over Flag Burning and the First Amendment

In a bold new statement, Donald Trump insists that flag burning should not be protected under the First Amendment, reigniting a decades-old constitutional debate already settled by the U.S. Supreme Court

Published

on

By

Donald Trump Sparks Debate Over Flag Burning and First Amendment Rights | Daily Global Diary
Donald Trump speaks at a recent roundtable, reigniting debate over flag burning and free speech under the First Amendment.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has once again sparked national debate — this time over one of America’s most sacred constitutional protections.

During a recent roundtable discussion, Trump revisited his long-standing belief that flag burning should not be considered protected free speech, declaring, “We took the freedom of speech away when it comes to that. You don’t burn the American flag.”

His remarks directly contradict decades of Supreme Court precedent affirming that burning the American flag, while deeply offensive to many, remains a form of symbolic expression safeguarded by the First Amendment.

ALSO READ : Dodgers fans left heartbroken as Clayton Kershaw faces nightmare inning vs. Phillies — “No one wanted to see this…”

“You can’t have people burning the flag of this country and then say it’s freedom of speech,” Trump added. “That’s not speech — that’s disrespect.”

A Familiar Trump Controversy Returns

This isn’t the first time Trump has made such remarks. As president, he frequently criticized the court’s 1989 decision in Texas v. Johnson, which held that flag burning is protected political expression.

That landmark 5–4 ruling came after protester Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag outside the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas — an act the Court said fell under free expression.

Yet Trump has continued to challenge that view. During his presidency, he even suggested potential penalties, saying flag burners should “face consequences, maybe even jail time or loss of citizenship.”

At the time, Justice Anthony Kennedy, who voted with the majority in the Texas v. Johnson case, wrote, “It is poignant but fundamental that the flag protects those who hold it in contempt.”

Trump, however, has long argued that respect for the flag should outweigh such constitutional nuances.

Reactions From Both Sides of the Aisle

Trump’s latest statement drew mixed reactions across social media platforms, including X (formerly Twitter).

Supporters applauded his stance as patriotic and necessary in an age of cultural division. One user wrote, “Finally someone said it. The flag isn’t just a piece of cloth — it’s our nation’s soul.”

Critics, however, accused Trump of once again undermining constitutional principles for political gain.

Donald Trump Sparks Debate Over Flag Burning and First Amendment Rights | Daily Global Diary


ACLU legal director David Cole told reporters, “The Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear that the government cannot prohibit expression simply because society finds it offensive.”

Others warned that restricting flag burning could open the door to broader censorship. “If we start making exceptions to free speech because we dislike it, we lose the core of democracy,” wrote one legal scholar at Harvard Law School.

Trump’s Broader Message: Patriotism Over Politics

Despite criticism, Trump framed his comments as a defense of patriotism rather than an assault on liberty.

“People have died for that flag,” he said. “We honor them by protecting it, not by setting it on fire.”

His remarks echo the populist rhetoric that has defined his political career — positioning himself as a defender of national values against what he often portrays as elite or un-American attitudes.

This strategy continues to resonate with many conservative voters, especially veterans and working-class Americans who view flag burning as an unforgivable act of disrespect.

The Legal Reality

While Trump’s statement drew cheers from some corners, constitutional experts quickly pointed out that his proposal would face steep legal hurdles.

The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the right to burn the flag in the 1990 case United States v. Eichman, striking down a federal law banning flag desecration.

Even conservative justices have largely supported the principle, emphasizing that freedom of expression must extend even to unpopular or offensive acts.

However, Trump’s influence continues to shape how Americans interpret patriotism, loyalty, and constitutional freedoms — often blending emotional nationalism with legal gray areas.

What Comes Next?

With Trump once again commanding headlines as a leading 2025 political figure, his comments have reignited cultural tensions that have simmered for years.

Political analysts suggest that this latest controversy could energize his base ahead of key campaign events, appealing to voters who prioritize traditional symbols of American pride.

Still, constitutional purists warn that such rhetoric risks eroding the very freedoms the flag represents.

As Justice Kennedy once wrote, “The flag symbolizes freedom, and that freedom includes the right to burn it.”

Trump’s supporters might disagree — but in the end, that disagreement itself is what defines the First Amendment.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending