Connect with us

Technology News

Criminals are ‘vibe hacking’ with AI as Anthropic warns of $500,000 ransoms and fake North Korean tech workers

AI firm Anthropic
reveals that its chatbot Claude has been misused in cyberattacks, ransom schemes, and even by North Korean IT workers infiltrating US companies.

Published

5 months ago

on

Criminals are vibe hacking with AI as Anthropic warns of $500,000 ransom attacks
AI firm Anthropic warns hackers are using Claude for cyberattacks, ransom schemes, and fake job infiltration.

Artificial intelligence is no longer just a tool for productivity—it is fast becoming a weapon in the hands of cybercriminals. In a new report released this week, AI infrastructure company Anthropic warned that its popular chatbot Claude has been exploited by hackers to perform cyberattacks at an unprecedented scale, with ransom demands reaching as high as $500,000.

ALSO READ : OpenAI sets up New Delhi office after ₹399 ChatGPT launch Sam Altman says India has all ingredients for AI leadership

The company’s Threat Intelligence team—led by researchers Alex Moix, Ken Lebedev, and Jacob Klein—uncovered a disturbing pattern: criminals are “vibe hacking,” using AI to manipulate emotions, trust, and decision-making, all while executing sophisticated cyber intrusions without deep technical expertise.

How “vibe hacking” works

Unlike traditional hacking, which requires strong coding and encryption skills, vibe hacking uses AI as both a technical assistant and a psychological weapon. According to Anthropic, one hacker used Claude to analyze stolen financial records, determine ransom amounts, and draft chilling ransom notes tailored to maximize emotional pressure on victims.

The targets were not small firms either. At least 17 organizations spanning healthcare, emergency services, government agencies, and religious institutions were attacked. The ransom demands ranged from $75,000 to $500,000, often requested in Bitcoin.

“Actors who cannot independently implement basic encryption or understand syscall mechanics are now successfully creating ransomware with evasion capabilities,” the report said—highlighting how AI has lowered the barrier for cybercrime.

Crypto scams and AI

This warning echoes earlier predictions by Chainalysis, a blockchain security firm, which forecast that 2025 could see record-breaking crypto scams as generative AI makes attacks cheaper and more scalable. The fusion of AI and cybercrime seems to be accelerating faster than regulators or companies can respond.

North Korean infiltration of US companies

Perhaps even more alarming is Anthropic’s discovery that North Korean IT workers have been using Claude to pass coding tests, fake job interviews, and land remote roles at Fortune 500 tech firms in the United States.

The scheme involved creating fake identities using government IDs, phone numbers, and even purchased LinkedIn and UpWork accounts. Once hired, these workers allegedly funneled their earnings back to the North Korean regime, bypassing international sanctions.

In one case, a worker used Claude to prepare interview responses for a full-stack engineer role at Polygon Labs, while others claimed fake experience at OpenSea and Chainlink.

Earlier this month, cybersecurity experts even “counter-hacked” one North Korean worker, exposing a team of six who shared at least 31 fake identities while applying for crypto-related jobs worldwide.

Anthropic’s response

While Anthropic emphasized that Claude comes with “sophisticated safety and security measures,” the report acknowledged that malicious actors continue to find loopholes. By making these cases public, the company says it hopes to strengthen industry-wide defenses and foster collaboration in the global AI safety community.

The revelations come amid growing global concern about how AI tools—from OpenAI’s ChatGPT to Anthropic’s Claude—can be misused when placed in the wrong hands. For regulators, the challenge is not just about building ethical AI but also about creating guardrails strong enough to resist the ingenuity of criminals who are now empowered by generative technology.

As vibe hacking grows, the question becomes urgent: can AI companies stay ahead of cybercriminals—or has the technology already tipped the balance of power?

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology News

Inside the Mind of the Man Who Trusts Dogs to Lead Movies

From AI labs to film sets, BARK innovation chief Mikkel Holm has a radical idea — what if dogs weren’t just stars, but storytellers?

Published

2 weeks ago

on

January 22, 2026

By

Meet the Man Who Thinks Dogs Should Be Film Directors | Daily Global Diary

In an era where artificial intelligence is already writing scripts, composing music, and generating entire films, one creative mind is asking a question that feels equal parts absurd and oddly profound: Why shouldn’t dogs be directors?

That mind belongs to Mikkel Holm, the Chief AI & Innovation Officer at BARK, the pet brand best known for turning dog culture into a billion-dollar business. Holm isn’t pitching a gimmick. He’s questioning how creativity itself is defined — and who gets to own it.

From Fetch to Final Cut

Holm’s thinking sits at the crossroads of AI, storytelling, and animal behavior. With generative tools becoming more intuitive, he believes creativity no longer needs to start with a human idea. A dog’s reactions — what excites them, what scares them, what keeps their attention — could become the raw data that shapes narratives.

“Dogs already tell us what they like,” Holm has suggested in industry conversations. “We just haven’t been listening in a cinematic way.”

ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”

Using sensors, computer vision, and behavioral AI models, a dog’s gaze, movement, or excitement could guide editing decisions, pacing, or even story arcs. The result wouldn’t be about dogs — it would be cinema filtered through a non-human perspective.

The Birth of the First Park Chan-Woof?

Holm jokingly refers to the possibility of minting the next Park Chan-wook — except this auteur would wag instead of walk the red carpet. The joke lands because it highlights something serious: great directors don’t just tell stories, they feel them. And dogs, arguably, are pure instinct.

Unlike human creators shaped by trends, algorithms, or box-office anxiety, dogs respond honestly. They don’t care about three-act structures or Rotten Tomatoes scores. They react in real time — and Holm believes that authenticity is something modern storytelling desperately needs.

Meet the Man Who Thinks Dogs Should Be Directors The Chief AI & Innovation Officer of BARK, Mikkel Holm, has a few ideas for minting the next Park Chan-woof.


Why BARK Is the Perfect Place for This Idea

At BARK, data about canine behavior isn’t abstract. It’s central to the business. Millions of interactions — toys chewed, treats rejected, boxes loved — already inform product design. Translating that behavioral intelligence into creative output feels like a natural extension.

Holm’s role isn’t about replacing human creators. Instead, it’s about collaboration — humans setting the framework, AI translating signals, and dogs influencing the final creative choices in ways we’ve never seen before.

Is This Art or Absurdity?

Skeptics, of course, will laugh. Dogs as directors sounds like a headline built for clicks. But then again, so did AI-written novels, virtual influencers, and fully synthetic pop stars — until they weren’t jokes anymore.

Holm’s idea taps into a deeper cultural shift: creativity is no longer exclusively human. As tools evolve, authorship becomes shared — between humans, machines, and perhaps, one day, animals.

And if the result is strange, emotional, or unexpectedly beautiful? That might be the point.

A Future Where Creativity Isn’t Just Human

Cinema has always evolved with technology — from silent films to sound, black-and-white to color, analog to digital. Holm’s vision suggests the next leap might not be technical, but philosophical.

What happens when we stop asking who is allowed to create?

If the first dog-directed short film ever premieres at a festival someday, don’t be surprised if it doesn’t explain itself. Dogs, after all, have never felt the need to justify their instincts. Maybe storytellers shouldn’t either.

Continue Reading

Technology News

Inside the Vision of the Man Who Trusts Dogs to Tell Stories on the Big Screen

From AI labs to film sets, BARK innovation chief Mikkel Holm has a radical idea — what if dogs weren’t just stars, but storytellers?

Published

3 weeks ago

on

January 13, 2026

By

Meet the Man Who Thinks Dogs Should Be Film Directors | Daily Global Diary

In an era where artificial intelligence is already writing scripts, composing music, and generating entire films, one creative mind is asking a question that feels equal parts absurd and oddly profound: Why shouldn’t dogs be directors?

That mind belongs to Mikkel Holm, the Chief AI & Innovation Officer at BARK, the pet brand best known for turning dog culture into a billion-dollar business. Holm isn’t pitching a gimmick. He’s questioning how creativity itself is defined — and who gets to own it.

From Fetch to Final Cut

Holm’s thinking sits at the crossroads of AI, storytelling, and animal behavior. With generative tools becoming more intuitive, he believes creativity no longer needs to start with a human idea. A dog’s reactions — what excites them, what scares them, what keeps their attention — could become the raw data that shapes narratives.

“Dogs already tell us what they like,” Holm has suggested in industry conversations. “We just haven’t been listening in a cinematic way.”

ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”

Using sensors, computer vision, and behavioral AI models, a dog’s gaze, movement, or excitement could guide editing decisions, pacing, or even story arcs. The result wouldn’t be about dogs — it would be cinema filtered through a non-human perspective.

The Birth of the First Park Chan-Woof?

Holm jokingly refers to the possibility of minting the next Park Chan-wook — except this auteur would wag instead of walk the red carpet. The joke lands because it highlights something serious: great directors don’t just tell stories, they feel them. And dogs, arguably, are pure instinct.

Unlike human creators shaped by trends, algorithms, or box-office anxiety, dogs respond honestly. They don’t care about three-act structures or Rotten Tomatoes scores. They react in real time — and Holm believes that authenticity is something modern storytelling desperately needs.

Meet the Man Who Thinks Dogs Should Be Directors The Chief AI & Innovation Officer of BARK, Mikkel Holm, has a few ideas for minting the next Park Chan-woof.


Why BARK Is the Perfect Place for This Idea

At BARK, data about canine behavior isn’t abstract. It’s central to the business. Millions of interactions — toys chewed, treats rejected, boxes loved — already inform product design. Translating that behavioral intelligence into creative output feels like a natural extension.

Holm’s role isn’t about replacing human creators. Instead, it’s about collaboration — humans setting the framework, AI translating signals, and dogs influencing the final creative choices in ways we’ve never seen before.

Is This Art or Absurdity?

Skeptics, of course, will laugh. Dogs as directors sounds like a headline built for clicks. But then again, so did AI-written novels, virtual influencers, and fully synthetic pop stars — until they weren’t jokes anymore.

Holm’s idea taps into a deeper cultural shift: creativity is no longer exclusively human. As tools evolve, authorship becomes shared — between humans, machines, and perhaps, one day, animals.

And if the result is strange, emotional, or unexpectedly beautiful? That might be the point.

A Future Where Creativity Isn’t Just Human

Cinema has always evolved with technology — from silent films to sound, black-and-white to color, analog to digital. Holm’s vision suggests the next leap might not be technical, but philosophical.

What happens when we stop asking who is allowed to create?

If the first dog-directed short film ever premieres at a festival someday, don’t be surprised if it doesn’t explain itself. Dogs, after all, have never felt the need to justify their instincts. Maybe storytellers shouldn’t either.

Continue Reading

Technology News

Meet the Man Who Wants Dogs in the Director’s Chair and Thinks Cinema Needs a Bark Side

From AI labs to film sets, BARK innovation chief Mikkel Holm has a radical idea — what if dogs weren’t just stars, but storytellers?

Published

1 month ago

on

January 6, 2026

By

Meet the Man Who Thinks Dogs Should Be Film Directors | Daily Global Diary
A playful yet provocative idea: Can canine instincts and AI collaboration reshape the future of filmmaking?

In an era where artificial intelligence is already writing scripts, composing music, and generating entire films, one creative mind is asking a question that feels equal parts absurd and oddly profound: Why shouldn’t dogs be directors?

That mind belongs to Mikkel Holm, the Chief AI & Innovation Officer at BARK, the pet brand best known for turning dog culture into a billion-dollar business. Holm isn’t pitching a gimmick. He’s questioning how creativity itself is defined — and who gets to own it.

From Fetch to Final Cut

Holm’s thinking sits at the crossroads of AI, storytelling, and animal behavior. With generative tools becoming more intuitive, he believes creativity no longer needs to start with a human idea. A dog’s reactions — what excites them, what scares them, what keeps their attention — could become the raw data that shapes narratives.

“Dogs already tell us what they like,” Holm has suggested in industry conversations. “We just haven’t been listening in a cinematic way.”

ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”

Using sensors, computer vision, and behavioral AI models, a dog’s gaze, movement, or excitement could guide editing decisions, pacing, or even story arcs. The result wouldn’t be about dogs — it would be cinema filtered through a non-human perspective.

The Birth of the First Park Chan-Woof?

Holm jokingly refers to the possibility of minting the next Park Chan-wook — except this auteur would wag instead of walk the red carpet. The joke lands because it highlights something serious: great directors don’t just tell stories, they feel them. And dogs, arguably, are pure instinct.

Unlike human creators shaped by trends, algorithms, or box-office anxiety, dogs respond honestly. They don’t care about three-act structures or Rotten Tomatoes scores. They react in real time — and Holm believes that authenticity is something modern storytelling desperately needs.

Meet the Man Who Thinks Dogs Should Be Directors The Chief AI & Innovation Officer of BARK, Mikkel Holm, has a few ideas for minting the next Park Chan-woof.


Why BARK Is the Perfect Place for This Idea

At BARK, data about canine behavior isn’t abstract. It’s central to the business. Millions of interactions — toys chewed, treats rejected, boxes loved — already inform product design. Translating that behavioral intelligence into creative output feels like a natural extension.

Holm’s role isn’t about replacing human creators. Instead, it’s about collaboration — humans setting the framework, AI translating signals, and dogs influencing the final creative choices in ways we’ve never seen before.

Is This Art or Absurdity?

Skeptics, of course, will laugh. Dogs as directors sounds like a headline built for clicks. But then again, so did AI-written novels, virtual influencers, and fully synthetic pop stars — until they weren’t jokes anymore.

Holm’s idea taps into a deeper cultural shift: creativity is no longer exclusively human. As tools evolve, authorship becomes shared — between humans, machines, and perhaps, one day, animals.

And if the result is strange, emotional, or unexpectedly beautiful? That might be the point.

A Future Where Creativity Isn’t Just Human

Cinema has always evolved with technology — from silent films to sound, black-and-white to color, analog to digital. Holm’s vision suggests the next leap might not be technical, but philosophical.

What happens when we stop asking who is allowed to create?

If the first dog-directed short film ever premieres at a festival someday, don’t be surprised if it doesn’t explain itself. Dogs, after all, have never felt the need to justify their instincts. Maybe storytellers shouldn’t either.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending