Food
Food Safety is Falling Apart and the Alarming Truth is We’re All at Risk
Staff cuts, collapsing oversight, and climate threats—World Food Safety Day reminds us why your next meal might not be as safe as you think.
Every bite we take is a leap of faith—faith that the food on our plates is clean, tested, and safe. But as we mark World Food Safety Day on June 7, alarming developments suggest that this faith may be misplaced. Amid dramatic budget cuts and agency dismantlings by the Trump-Vance Administration, food safety oversight in the U.S. and around the globe is on shaky ground, and experts are sounding the alarm.
In recent months, a wave of layoffs and resignations has gutted critical departments at both the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to industry insiders, these cuts have directly impacted teams responsible for inspecting and testing our food supply. In a particularly chilling move, the FDA suspended a key quality control program for its food-testing labs, a program that ensured pathogens and contaminants were detected early and consistently.
“We are teetering on the brink of collapse,” said Sarah Sorscher, Director of Regulatory Affairs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. And it’s not just domestic diners who should worry. The dismantling of USAID and the closure of the Feed the Future Innovation Labs, once pillars of global food security, mean reduced safety protocols across supply chains in places like Kenya, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Nigeria.
It’s easy to overlook food safety—until it fails. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 600 million people globally fall ill each year from contaminated food, with 420,000 deaths, many of them children under five. The loss isn’t just human; it’s economic. In low- and middle-income nations, $110 billion is lost annually due to unsafe food. That’s a staggering toll—one we can’t afford.
As the climate crisis reshapes our environment, the risk multiplies. Warmer, wetter conditions are breeding grounds for emerging pathogens, from bacteria to harmful fungi. “Microbes love hot, humid conditions,” explained Barbara Kowalcyk, a food safety scholar at the Milken Institute School of Public Health.
Experts like Markus Lipp of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization stress that food safety isn’t just science—it’s social trust. “It’s about creating confidence in the food we eat and in the systems that protect us,” he said. That trust is eroding as policymakers in Washington appear to sideline the very science that safeguards our meals.
This World Food Safety Day, the WHO is urging governments, scientists, and everyday citizens to stand up and act. The 2022–2030 Global Strategy for Food Safety offers a roadmap, but implementation is what will determine whether people eat safely—or suffer. Programs like GAIN’s EatSafe and the Codex Alimentarius Commission provide science-based standards that respect local cultures. They are lifelines that need support, not sabotage.
“This is a global village,” said Dr. Abdou Tenkouano, former Executive Director of CORAF. “We are all interconnected, interdependent, interlinked.” His words ring louder now than ever. Because when food safety fails in one part of the world, it ripples through trade, economy, and public health everywhere.
So what can we do? Support science. Demand accountability. Prioritize food safety in policy discussions. Because the truth is, when it comes to food safety, no one eats alone—we’re all in this together.
Technology News
Inside the Mind of the Man Who Trusts Dogs to Lead Movies
From AI labs to film sets, BARK innovation chief Mikkel Holm has a radical idea — what if dogs weren’t just stars, but storytellers?
In an era where artificial intelligence is already writing scripts, composing music, and generating entire films, one creative mind is asking a question that feels equal parts absurd and oddly profound: Why shouldn’t dogs be directors?
That mind belongs to Mikkel Holm, the Chief AI & Innovation Officer at BARK, the pet brand best known for turning dog culture into a billion-dollar business. Holm isn’t pitching a gimmick. He’s questioning how creativity itself is defined — and who gets to own it.
From Fetch to Final Cut
Holm’s thinking sits at the crossroads of AI, storytelling, and animal behavior. With generative tools becoming more intuitive, he believes creativity no longer needs to start with a human idea. A dog’s reactions — what excites them, what scares them, what keeps their attention — could become the raw data that shapes narratives.
“Dogs already tell us what they like,” Holm has suggested in industry conversations. “We just haven’t been listening in a cinematic way.”
ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”
Using sensors, computer vision, and behavioral AI models, a dog’s gaze, movement, or excitement could guide editing decisions, pacing, or even story arcs. The result wouldn’t be about dogs — it would be cinema filtered through a non-human perspective.
The Birth of the First Park Chan-Woof?
Holm jokingly refers to the possibility of minting the next Park Chan-wook — except this auteur would wag instead of walk the red carpet. The joke lands because it highlights something serious: great directors don’t just tell stories, they feel them. And dogs, arguably, are pure instinct.
Unlike human creators shaped by trends, algorithms, or box-office anxiety, dogs respond honestly. They don’t care about three-act structures or Rotten Tomatoes scores. They react in real time — and Holm believes that authenticity is something modern storytelling desperately needs.

Why BARK Is the Perfect Place for This Idea
At BARK, data about canine behavior isn’t abstract. It’s central to the business. Millions of interactions — toys chewed, treats rejected, boxes loved — already inform product design. Translating that behavioral intelligence into creative output feels like a natural extension.
Holm’s role isn’t about replacing human creators. Instead, it’s about collaboration — humans setting the framework, AI translating signals, and dogs influencing the final creative choices in ways we’ve never seen before.
Is This Art or Absurdity?
Skeptics, of course, will laugh. Dogs as directors sounds like a headline built for clicks. But then again, so did AI-written novels, virtual influencers, and fully synthetic pop stars — until they weren’t jokes anymore.
Holm’s idea taps into a deeper cultural shift: creativity is no longer exclusively human. As tools evolve, authorship becomes shared — between humans, machines, and perhaps, one day, animals.
And if the result is strange, emotional, or unexpectedly beautiful? That might be the point.
A Future Where Creativity Isn’t Just Human
Cinema has always evolved with technology — from silent films to sound, black-and-white to color, analog to digital. Holm’s vision suggests the next leap might not be technical, but philosophical.
What happens when we stop asking who is allowed to create?
If the first dog-directed short film ever premieres at a festival someday, don’t be surprised if it doesn’t explain itself. Dogs, after all, have never felt the need to justify their instincts. Maybe storytellers shouldn’t either.
Technology News
Inside the Vision of the Man Who Trusts Dogs to Tell Stories on the Big Screen
From AI labs to film sets, BARK innovation chief Mikkel Holm has a radical idea — what if dogs weren’t just stars, but storytellers?
In an era where artificial intelligence is already writing scripts, composing music, and generating entire films, one creative mind is asking a question that feels equal parts absurd and oddly profound: Why shouldn’t dogs be directors?
That mind belongs to Mikkel Holm, the Chief AI & Innovation Officer at BARK, the pet brand best known for turning dog culture into a billion-dollar business. Holm isn’t pitching a gimmick. He’s questioning how creativity itself is defined — and who gets to own it.
From Fetch to Final Cut
Holm’s thinking sits at the crossroads of AI, storytelling, and animal behavior. With generative tools becoming more intuitive, he believes creativity no longer needs to start with a human idea. A dog’s reactions — what excites them, what scares them, what keeps their attention — could become the raw data that shapes narratives.
“Dogs already tell us what they like,” Holm has suggested in industry conversations. “We just haven’t been listening in a cinematic way.”
ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”
Using sensors, computer vision, and behavioral AI models, a dog’s gaze, movement, or excitement could guide editing decisions, pacing, or even story arcs. The result wouldn’t be about dogs — it would be cinema filtered through a non-human perspective.
The Birth of the First Park Chan-Woof?
Holm jokingly refers to the possibility of minting the next Park Chan-wook — except this auteur would wag instead of walk the red carpet. The joke lands because it highlights something serious: great directors don’t just tell stories, they feel them. And dogs, arguably, are pure instinct.
Unlike human creators shaped by trends, algorithms, or box-office anxiety, dogs respond honestly. They don’t care about three-act structures or Rotten Tomatoes scores. They react in real time — and Holm believes that authenticity is something modern storytelling desperately needs.

Why BARK Is the Perfect Place for This Idea
At BARK, data about canine behavior isn’t abstract. It’s central to the business. Millions of interactions — toys chewed, treats rejected, boxes loved — already inform product design. Translating that behavioral intelligence into creative output feels like a natural extension.
Holm’s role isn’t about replacing human creators. Instead, it’s about collaboration — humans setting the framework, AI translating signals, and dogs influencing the final creative choices in ways we’ve never seen before.
Is This Art or Absurdity?
Skeptics, of course, will laugh. Dogs as directors sounds like a headline built for clicks. But then again, so did AI-written novels, virtual influencers, and fully synthetic pop stars — until they weren’t jokes anymore.
Holm’s idea taps into a deeper cultural shift: creativity is no longer exclusively human. As tools evolve, authorship becomes shared — between humans, machines, and perhaps, one day, animals.
And if the result is strange, emotional, or unexpectedly beautiful? That might be the point.
A Future Where Creativity Isn’t Just Human
Cinema has always evolved with technology — from silent films to sound, black-and-white to color, analog to digital. Holm’s vision suggests the next leap might not be technical, but philosophical.
What happens when we stop asking who is allowed to create?
If the first dog-directed short film ever premieres at a festival someday, don’t be surprised if it doesn’t explain itself. Dogs, after all, have never felt the need to justify their instincts. Maybe storytellers shouldn’t either.
Technology News
Meet the Man Who Wants Dogs in the Director’s Chair and Thinks Cinema Needs a Bark Side
From AI labs to film sets, BARK innovation chief Mikkel Holm has a radical idea — what if dogs weren’t just stars, but storytellers?
In an era where artificial intelligence is already writing scripts, composing music, and generating entire films, one creative mind is asking a question that feels equal parts absurd and oddly profound: Why shouldn’t dogs be directors?
That mind belongs to Mikkel Holm, the Chief AI & Innovation Officer at BARK, the pet brand best known for turning dog culture into a billion-dollar business. Holm isn’t pitching a gimmick. He’s questioning how creativity itself is defined — and who gets to own it.
From Fetch to Final Cut
Holm’s thinking sits at the crossroads of AI, storytelling, and animal behavior. With generative tools becoming more intuitive, he believes creativity no longer needs to start with a human idea. A dog’s reactions — what excites them, what scares them, what keeps their attention — could become the raw data that shapes narratives.
“Dogs already tell us what they like,” Holm has suggested in industry conversations. “We just haven’t been listening in a cinematic way.”
ALSO READ : Younghoe Koo Explains Botched Field Goal After Slip: “The Ball Was Moving So I Pulled Up”
Using sensors, computer vision, and behavioral AI models, a dog’s gaze, movement, or excitement could guide editing decisions, pacing, or even story arcs. The result wouldn’t be about dogs — it would be cinema filtered through a non-human perspective.
The Birth of the First Park Chan-Woof?
Holm jokingly refers to the possibility of minting the next Park Chan-wook — except this auteur would wag instead of walk the red carpet. The joke lands because it highlights something serious: great directors don’t just tell stories, they feel them. And dogs, arguably, are pure instinct.
Unlike human creators shaped by trends, algorithms, or box-office anxiety, dogs respond honestly. They don’t care about three-act structures or Rotten Tomatoes scores. They react in real time — and Holm believes that authenticity is something modern storytelling desperately needs.

Why BARK Is the Perfect Place for This Idea
At BARK, data about canine behavior isn’t abstract. It’s central to the business. Millions of interactions — toys chewed, treats rejected, boxes loved — already inform product design. Translating that behavioral intelligence into creative output feels like a natural extension.
Holm’s role isn’t about replacing human creators. Instead, it’s about collaboration — humans setting the framework, AI translating signals, and dogs influencing the final creative choices in ways we’ve never seen before.
Is This Art or Absurdity?
Skeptics, of course, will laugh. Dogs as directors sounds like a headline built for clicks. But then again, so did AI-written novels, virtual influencers, and fully synthetic pop stars — until they weren’t jokes anymore.
Holm’s idea taps into a deeper cultural shift: creativity is no longer exclusively human. As tools evolve, authorship becomes shared — between humans, machines, and perhaps, one day, animals.
And if the result is strange, emotional, or unexpectedly beautiful? That might be the point.
A Future Where Creativity Isn’t Just Human
Cinema has always evolved with technology — from silent films to sound, black-and-white to color, analog to digital. Holm’s vision suggests the next leap might not be technical, but philosophical.
What happens when we stop asking who is allowed to create?
If the first dog-directed short film ever premieres at a festival someday, don’t be surprised if it doesn’t explain itself. Dogs, after all, have never felt the need to justify their instincts. Maybe storytellers shouldn’t either.
-
Entertainment6 days agoHe-Man Wears a Suit Now… Nicholas Galitzine’s ‘Masters of the Universe’ Trailer Drops a Shock Fans Didn’t See Coming
-
Entertainment1 week agoBrazil Eyes Oscar History Again… ‘The Secret Agent’ Scores Best Picture Nomination as Wagner Moura Stuns Hollywood
-
Entertainment4 days ago“Comedy Needs Courage Again…”: Judd Apatow Opens Up on Mel Brooks, Talking to Rob Reiner, and Why Studio Laughs Have Vanished
-
Entertainment1 week agoBox Office Shocker as Chris Pratt’s ‘Mercy’ Knocks ‘Avatar 3’ Off the Top but Nature Had Other Plans…
-
Entertainment6 days agoOscars Go Global in a Big Way as This Year’s Nominations Signal a New Era: ‘The Academy Is Finally Looking Beyond Hollywood…’
-
Entertainment1 week agoMichael Bay Makes a Power Move… Blockbuster Director Signs with CAA in a Deal That’s Turning Heads
-
Entertainment6 days ago“Dangerously Kinky… and Darkly Funny”: Olivia Wilde and Cooper Hoffman Push Boundaries in ‘I Want Your Sex’
-
Entertainment1 week ago“I Thought I’d Pass Out”… Sundance Veterans Reveal the Nerves, Breakdowns and Breakthroughs Behind Indie Cinema’s Biggest Stage
