The internet has caught fire with one question: Are new stimulus checks finally coming?
As November 2025 rolls in and household budgets remain tight, millions of Americans are searching for answers — and rumors. But despite viral posts claiming “$2,000 Trump checks” and “IRS direct deposits this month,” the truth is far more complicated.

According to federal officials, no new congressional legislation has been approved authorizing stimulus payments. That means the Internal Revenue Service cannot issue any fresh payouts — at least not yet.

The confusion stems from a mix of old tax credits, political promises, and online misinformation. And at the center of this storm is former President Donald Trump , whose recent “tariff dividend” proposal has sparked both excitement and skepticism.

IRS: No New Payments Scheduled — Here’s What Actually Happened

The most recent federally approved stimulus-related payment was tied to the Recovery Rebate Credit, which the IRS automatically issued between December 2024 and January 2025.
Eligible taxpayers who never claimed the credit on their 2021 tax returns received up to $1,400 per individual — no application required.

But that window officially closed on April 15, 2025.
The IRS has made it clear:
No new federal stimulus checks are authorized for November 2025.

The agency also renewed its warnings about stimulus scams, noting that fraudsters are now sending fake text messages, emails, and social media posts impersonating the IRS.

Trump’s $2,000 Tariff Dividend: Real Proposal or Political Mirage?

The biggest spark behind the resurgence of “stimulus payments” is Trump’s latest economic pitch:
a $2,000-per-person tariff dividend, funded by revenue from sweeping global import taxes.

In a viral post on Truth Social, Trump promised:

“A dividend of at least $2000 a person will be paid to everyone… not including high-income people.”

His proposal indicates the dividend would target middle- and lower-income households, but nothing is finalized.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent later clarified that eligibility may be limited to individuals or families earning $100,000 or less.

At a recent White House briefing, press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed:
“Yes, the administration is committed to pursuing these checks.”
But even she did not suggest a timeline.

So Will These Checks Ever Happen?

Economists say: maybe — but not soon.

Violet Jira, a reporter for NOTUS, told FOX 5 that multiple hurdles stand in the way, including:

• Congressional approval is required
• Tariff revenue may fall short of the $600 billion needed
• A Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s tariff authority is still pending
• There is no official payment infrastructure in place

That hasn’t stopped online excitement. Google searches for “Trump $2,000 check” and “stimulus 2025 deposit date” have skyrocketed this week.

Where the Fake Stimulus Claims Come From

Several viral posts claiming “$1,702 checks” or “$1,390 direct deposits” often reference state or local programs, not federal payments.

One common source of confusion is the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend , which pays residents yearly oil revenue shares.

Scammers are exploiting this confusion by sending:

• Fake IRS text alerts
• Phishing emails requesting bank details
• Social media posts redirecting users to malicious websites

The IRS reminded taxpayers that it never initiates communication via emails, texts, or DMs.
All legitimate contact starts with an official mailed letter, which can be verified through an IRS Online Account.

What Should Americans Expect Next?

As of today:

✔ IRS: No new federal stimulus checks approved
✔ Tariff dividend: Proposed, not passed
✔ Recovery Rebate Credit: Expired
✔ White House: Exploring legal pathways, but nothing final
✔ Scams: Increasing rapidly

For now, the biggest message from federal agencies is simple:
Be cautious — and don’t fall for viral payment rumors.

But with Trump continuing to push his tariff dividend idea as a major affordability solution — and his own party growing increasingly anxious — the national conversation isn’t going anywhere.

For more update DAILY GLOBAL DIARY

When governments admit their weaknesses, it can feel like a rare moment of honesty in politics. But this week, Australia witnessed something else—hesitation, denial, and a possible retreat from the most significant tax reform on the books.

The Labor government appears to be wavering on its plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, from 15% to 30%. Originally announced in February 2023 and due to take effect in July this year, the measure was expected to raise about $2 billion annually. Now, according to reports in the Australian Financial Review, the Prime Minister’s Office has taken a renewed interest in the policy, with whispers of backpedaling growing louder.

Why it matters

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has consistently argued the tax affects no more than 80,000 of Australia’s wealthiest citizens. Yet the proposal, which also applies to unrealised gains on large super balances, has powerful critics. Chief among them is former Prime Minister Paul Keating, who has lobbied against the plan in recent weeks. Keating argues the reform undermines the purity of the super system he helped architect in the 1990s.

If the cabinet walks away, analysts warn it signals a bad omen for broader reform—whether it’s tackling capital gains tax discounts on investment properties or addressing bracket creep that disproportionately burdens younger workers.

A culture of secrecy and political missteps

The uncertainty comes against a backdrop of heated political moments. Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley accused Labor of fostering a “culture of secrecy” over proposed Freedom of Information changes. Meanwhile, NT Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price created controversy after suggesting migration from India was politically motivated to benefit Labor—comments she later walked back as a “mistake.”

Such distractions have only amplified frustration among voters who expected Labor to push real, long-term reforms rather than waver on them.

What’s at stake

The super tax was Labor’s only structural tax reform carried into the last election with a clear mandate. If it is abandoned now, the retreat will send a message: even modest reforms targeting the wealthy are politically untouchable.

As John Howard and Peter Costello once expanded superannuation opportunities for baby boomers, today’s leaders face the hard choice of balancing fairness against political backlash. Walking away could cement the perception
For more Update http://www.dailyglobaldiary.com

In a landmark speech that has already stirred global attention, Michele Bullock, Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), revealed that the central bank is embracing artificial intelligence in a bold new way. Speaking at the Shann Memorial Lecture in Perth, she confirmed that staffers have started using a specially designed AI chatbot to process decades of internal research and better understand the Australian economy.

The chatbot, intriguingly named RBA PubChat, has been tasked with combing through more than 20,000 RBA documents and 22,000 conversations with businesses, offering staff real-time insights into issues like inflation trends, labour market shifts, and household financial vulnerabilities.

“This tool does not replace expert human judgment, rather it enhances it,” Bullock said. “It helps our analysts get to the heart of what businesses are saying, faster and more effectively.”

What exactly is RBA PubChat?

According to Bullock, RBA PubChat is more than just a search engine. It acts as a living archive of institutional knowledge spanning four decades. Analysts can ask questions, receive contextualised summaries, and quickly compare current patterns with historical precedents.

The central bank has long been under pressure to keep up with rapid technological advancements, and with AI tools already disrupting industries from finance to healthcare, the RBA’s adoption signals a turning point.

Bullock emphasised that AI is not being used to set monetary policy or make interest rate decisions, but rather to support human researchers. With Australia’s cash rate sitting at 3.6 per cent and the next decision due on September 30, analysts believe tools like PubChat could sharpen policy debates.

Why AI matters for the RBA

Bullock’s announcement comes at a time when central banks worldwide are grappling with inflation, wage growth, and global economic uncertainty. The RBA has a dual mandate: keep inflation under control while also supporting employment.

“To be clear, we are not using AI to formulate or set monetary policy,” she said. “Instead, we are looking to leverage it to improve efficiency and amplify the impact of staff efforts in research and analysis.”

She also noted that technological change inevitably reshapes labour markets. With AI already causing mass layoffs in global firms—such as Dutch navigation company TomTom cutting 300 jobs—questions are swirling about whether Australia will face similar disruptions.

A changing workforce

Bullock acknowledged that while some roles could be displaced, AI would also create entirely new ones. “While many experts anticipate a net increase in jobs, it is likely to be more nuanced,” she explained. “Some roles will be redefined, others might be displaced, and new ones will be created.”

She urged governments to prepare for this shift by supporting re-skilling and education initiatives. The future of work, she argued, depends not only on technology itself but on how policymakers manage the transition.

Global implications

Bullock’s remarks align with a broader trend: central banks from Washington to Frankfurt are exploring AI’s potential to improve forecasting. The RBA’s move could place Australia at the forefront of this global race.

Analysts say that by contextualising business surveys and providing rapid historical comparisons, PubChat could make monetary policy decisions more data-driven than ever before.

Yet, there are risks. Critics warn that AI systems can produce biases or misinterpret complex economic signals. “The danger is relying too heavily on the machine,” one financial analyst commented. “Central banks must remain transparent and accountable to the public, not hide behind algorithms.”

The road ahead

For now, RBA PubChat is still in its testing phase. But the central bank has big ambitions: building comprehensive real-time indicators, identifying early signs of inflation pressure, and uncovering hidden vulnerabilities in household finances.

Bullock summed it up clearly: “Tools like this are becoming essential. The growing volume of data and the accelerating pace of analysis have led to exponential growth in our internal knowledge.”

As Australia awaits the RBA board’s September 30 decision on interest rates, all eyes will be on how PubChat shapes future debates. The experiment could redefine not just how the RBA works, but how governments and institutions worldwide integrate AI into public decision-making.

For readers tracking the intersection of economics and technology, this may be just the beginning.

Visit our site for more news www.DailyGlobalDiary.com