It was supposed to be a routine moment at the FIFA World Cup 2026 draw ceremony in Washington, D.C. Instead, former U.S. President Donald Trump — now chairing the North American World Cup Task Force — delivered a remark that instantly became the headline.

Standing beside FIFA President Gianni Infantino , Trump suggested that the United States should rebrand its version of football so that soccer — known globally as “football” — could finally claim the name on American soil.

“When you think about it, shouldn’t it really be called… I mean this is football, there’s no question about it,” Trump said. “We need to come up with another name for the NFL stuff.”

The comment sparked laughter inside the packed John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, yet it also ignited genuine debate across American social media — especially on X (formerly Twitter), where fans of both soccer and the NFL instantly took sides.

A Remark Followed by a Historic Honor

Right after his naming suggestion, Trump received the first-ever FIFA Peace Prize, an award created to recognize individuals who promote “unity and peace through global sport.”

Infantino personally handed Trump a golden trophy featuring a pair of hands holding a football and a medal he wore moments after receiving it.

“Super honor, really amazing,” Trump told the crowd while posing for a selfie with Infantino — a moment that quickly went viral.

According to the prize citation, the award is presented yearly to a distinguished figure whose global leadership advances international harmony.

Trump joins no previous honorees — because FIFA created the prize for the first time this year.

A Major World Cup Responsibility

As the United States prepares to co-host the 2026 FIFA World Cup with Canada and Mexico , Trump currently chairs the tournament’s national task force.
His vice chair is JD Vance, while Andrew Giuliani (son of former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani) oversees executive operations.

Trump previously warned that World Cup matches could be moved out of cities deemed unsafe, but at Friday’s event he changed tone:

“We’re ready. And if any city needs help, the federal government will take care of it.”

The United States will host 11 of the 16 official World Cup cities, including Los Angeles, Dallas, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Miami.

The World Cup Final is scheduled for July 19, 2026, at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

Why Trump Says NFL Should Change Its Name

Trump’s argument wasn’t entirely comedic — he insists that the sport Americans call “football” barely uses the foot, whereas soccer clearly does.
In his words:

“It really doesn’t make sense when you think about it.”

The comment reignited a decade-old cultural debate:
Should soccer finally be called “football” in America?

Fans of the NFL fired back immediately, arguing that the term “football” is deeply embedded in U.S. sports culture and tradition. Others believe the World Cup — expected to be the biggest sporting event in American history — may push the country toward a linguistic shift.

Even some analysts joked that Trump may have “accidentally started a war between MLS fans and Cowboys fans.”

A World Cup That Could Redefine America’s Sports Identity

With the world’s most watched tournament coming to North America, soccer’s growth curve in the U.S. has exploded.
Leagues like Major League Soccer continue to break attendance and revenue records, especially following the arrival of Lionel Messi to Inter Miami.

Sports economists believe the 2026 tournament will be a landmark moment for the sport in the United States — possibly shifting language, culture, and how future generations talk about the game.

For now, Trump’s statement remains both a joke and a challenge — one that Americans will likely continue debating until the World Cup whistle blows next summer.

For more Update – DAINIK DIARY

Former President Donald Trump hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska this week in a high-stakes summit aimed at ending the devastating war in Ukraine. While the summit failed to secure a ceasefire, it triggered a cascade of diplomatic drama, culminating in an Oval Office confrontation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that now has European leaders rushing to Washington.

The Trump-Putin meeting marked one of the most consequential diplomatic engagements in recent years. The war in Ukraine — now in its fourth year since Russia’s full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022 — has claimed approximately 2 million lives and fractured global alliances. Trump, who has repeatedly claimed the war would have “never happened” under his presidency, is campaigning on promises to broker peace “on day one.”

According to Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff, the Alaska summit yielded “substantial concessions,” including robust security guarantees for Ukraine and a Russian legislative commitment to halt territorial expansion beyond a finalized peace deal.

“We agreed on much more robust security guarantees… The Russians agreed on enshrining legislatively language that they would attest to not attempting to take any more land from Ukraine,” Witkoff revealed.

But those diplomatic overtures unraveled quickly in Washington.

The Explosive Oval Office Exchange

Trump convened an Oval Office meeting with Zelenskyy and Vice President JD Vance, intending to brief them on the summit’s progress and discuss next steps. Instead, tensions exploded.

Zelenskyy openly mocked the idea of negotiating with Putin, prompting a scathing tirade from Trump:

“We gave you, through this stupid president, $350 billion. We gave you military equipment… If you didn’t have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks… you don’t have the cards,” Trump reportedly shouted.

The verbal firefight led to Zelenskyy storming out of Washington early. A pending minerals trade agreement, initially expected to be shelved, was mysteriously ratified afterward — though not without questions surrounding the White House’s pressure tactics.

The incident has rattled diplomatic circles across Europe, with many leaders expressing fears that Zelenskyy is being “bullied” into peace terms unfavorable to Ukraine.

Europe Steps In, Rubio Fires Back

On CBS’ Face the Nation, Senator Marco Rubio fiercely defended Trump and lashed out at host Margaret Brennan for suggesting European leaders were flying in to support Zelenskyy during post-summit talks.

“That is not true… They’re not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied,” Rubio said, raising his voice. “This is such a stupid media narrative.”

Brennan had pointed out that European allies were concerned Zelenskyy would be forced to sign away strategic leverage under Trump’s pressure, citing the bruising Oval Office incident.

Rubio dismissed those concerns outright:

“We had one meeting with Putin and like a dozen meetings with Zelenskyy… The President talked to these leaders as early as Thursday.”

He added that the next phase would likely include a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy — or at the very least, a forum where both warring leaders are brought to the same table.

What’s Next?

Despite the heated back-and-forth, both the U.S. and Russia characterized the Alaska summit as “progress.” No ceasefire was declared, but plans are underway for another round of talks.

Zelenskyy, whose political brand is built on unyielding resistance to Russian aggression, now finds himself in an increasingly isolated position. His Western backers seem divided: some, like European heads of state, are pushing for continued military support; others, such as Trump’s circle, are aggressively angling for a peace deal — no matter the optics.

The unexpected drama has intensified scrutiny on Trump’s diplomatic strategy and raised new questions about how future peace negotiations will unfold.

And while the war still rages in eastern Ukraine, the political battle over how to end it just escalated — not in Kyiv or Moscow, but inside the Oval Office.
For more Update http://www.dailyglobaldiary.com

In a move sending shockwaves through the European auto industry, Gilles Vidal — the celebrated French designer who played a pivotal role in reviving Renault’s design identity — is heading back to where it all began: Stellantis.

After five transformative years at Renault, Vidal will officially take over as the head of design for multiple Stellantis brands including Citroën, Peugeot, Opel, Fiat, Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Lancia, and DS Automobiles — replacing outgoing design chief Jean-Pierre Ploué as of October 1, 2025.

“In a world where technology and design must move forward together to transform the customer experience, this challenge motivates me deeply,” Vidal said in a statement.

From Peugeot’s Resurrection to Renault’s Rebirth

Before joining Renault in 2020, Gilles Vidal had already made his mark. He was widely credited as one of the leading forces behind Peugeot’s revival, having designed icons like the Peugeot 208, 308, and 2008 — all of which earned the European Car of the Year title.

At Citroën, where he started his career in 1996, Vidal honed his reputation as a bold and forward-thinking designer. But his move to Renault was seen as a major coup at the time — and one that paid off handsomely for the diamond-branded automaker.

At Renault, Vidal spearheaded design for several next-gen vehicles including:

• Renault Scénic Vision
• Renault Rafale
• Renault Symbioz
• The all-electric R4 and R5
• The high-concept Emblem car, considered a future luxury flagship

His departure now raises questions: Can Renault maintain its newfound design identity without him? And what will Stellantis gain from Vidal’s return?

A Strategic Win for Stellantis

According to industry insiders, this move is being celebrated as a “power play” by Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares. The group’s European market chief Jean-Philippe Imparato stated:

“His deep understanding of European automotive culture and his forward-looking design vision will be essential as we continue to redefine mobility and strengthen the identity of our European brands.”

Vidal will collaborate closely with Stellantis Chief Design Officer Ralph Gilles, working across multiple markets and segments—especially city cars and light vehicles.

What Does This Mean for the Future of Car Design?

With so many brands under Stellantis struggling for individual identity—especially Lancia, DS, and Opel—Vidal’s new role will be more than just artistic. It’s strategic. The job requires branding insight, innovation, and deep market instincts, all of which Vidal has in abundance.

This also comes at a time when EV design is becoming the new battleground, and cross-brand consistency can make or break long-term adoption. Vidal’s touch could reshape how Europe sees Stellantis — not just as a collection of legacy brands, but as a futuristic design powerhouse.

Final Thoughts: Renault’s Loss, Stellantis’s Jackpot

In just five years, Gilles Vidal helped Renault rediscover its design soul. His sudden exit is a major blow to the company, especially with its ambitious EV roadmap just gaining momentum. But for Stellantis, it’s a chance to consolidate influence over the European auto market with one of the industry’s most visionary designers now in their corner.

And with Avenger EVs, Peugeot concepts, and Fiat revivals already in progress — Vidal’s next chapter could be his boldest yet.
For more Update http://www.dailyglobaldiary.com