Connect with us

Tech

the GENIUS Act Blocks Big Tech and Banks from Controlling Stablecoins

The GENIUS Act sets firm boundaries on stablecoin issuers, preventing tech giants and banks from dominating the market

Published

on

GENIUS Act
GENIUS Act reshapes stablecoin future with bold rules for banks and tech giants

GENIUS Act — officially known as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins — has passed through the House with broad bipartisan support. While headlines focused on its historic nature, insiders say a quiet revolution is happening under the radar: the GENIUS Act makes it nearly impossible for Big Tech and major banks to monopolize the stablecoin industry.

Circle‘s Chief Strategy Officer Dante Disparte, a long-time advocate for regulatory clarity in crypto, called out what he dubbed the “Libra clause” of the GENIUS Act, referencing Meta’s (formerly Facebook) failed stablecoin project. The clause mandates that any non-bank tech company wanting to mint a dollar-backed digital token must do so through a standalone legal entity — one designed to be stable, neutral, and transparent.

“It creates clear rules that I think in the end the biggest winners are the US consumers and market participants and frankly the dollar itself,” said Disparte on the Unchained Podcast.


What the GENIUS Act Really Means for Stablecoins

The GENIUS Act isn’t just a regulatory milestone — it’s a strategic framework designed to ensure stablecoins serve public interest rather than becoming tools for corporate expansion or unchecked speculation.

Let’s unpack five game-changing rules embedded in the Act:

  1. Big Tech Must Spin Off Standalone Entities
    • Tech companies like Google, Apple, or Meta are barred from launching stablecoins unless they establish fully separate entities, similar to how Circle operates.
    • These entities must comply with strict regulatory oversight and antitrust assessments.
  2. Banks Must Use Legally Isolated Subsidiaries
    • Even traditional financial institutions must house stablecoin operations in separate subsidiaries.
    • These subsidiaries are barred from taking risks — no leverage, lending, or fractional reserves.
  3. No Interest-Bearing Stablecoins
    • In one of the most controversial sections of the GENIUS Act, issuers are banned from offering yield or interest directly on stablecoin holdings.
    • This directly impacts firms like PayPal and JPMorgan that were exploring interest models for their digital tokens.
  4. Mandatory Federal Charter for Large Issuers
    • Issuers holding more than $10 billion in assets must apply for a national trust-bank charter.
    • Those below this threshold may continue operating under state-based money transmitter laws, maintaining local jurisdiction flexibility.
  5. Strong Criminal Penalties for Unbacked Tokens
    • The Act criminalizes the issuance of unbacked “stable” tokens — like the failed TerraUSD, effectively banning similar experiments from being replicated in the U.S.

How the GENIUS Act Protects Against Libra-Like Projects

The “Libra clause,” as named by Disparte, was born from the ashes of Meta’s Libra/Diem project — a global stablecoin initiative that collapsed under the weight of regulatory scrutiny. The GENIUS Act now codifies protections to ensure no single tech firm can unilaterally launch a global currency alternative backed by its own user base and data infrastructure.

This is a huge win for proponents of financial decentralization and consumer protection, according to Dante Disparte, who worked with the World Economic Forum before joining Circle.


Impact on Traditional Banks and the “Deposit Token” Model

Wall Street firms including JPMorgan Chase have proposed “deposit tokens” — stablecoins backed by customer deposits — as a safer alternative to crypto-native stablecoins. However, the GENIUS Act effectively handcuffs these efforts by forcing such coins to remain completely risk-averse.

“It’s even more conservative than what JPMorgan envisioned,” Disparte noted.

This aligns with federal goals of separating deposit-taking institutions from high-risk digital assets, mirroring moves by regulators at the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).


The Yield Ban and Its Surprising Upside for DeFi

Perhaps the most contentious element of the GENIUS Act is the ban on interest-bearing stablecoins. While consumer advocates applaud the effort to keep stablecoins truly “stable,” analysts suggest this will accelerate capital migration into Ethereum-based DeFi platforms like Aave, Compound, and MakerDAO.

“The yield will just move to the DeFi layer,” said Nic Puckrin, a DeFi strategist. “We’re looking at a possible DeFi Summer 2.0.”

CoinFund’s Christopher Perkins echoed the sentiment, adding that institutional investors — who are legally bound to generate yield — may now pivot heavily toward on-chain protocols for returns.


Institutional Implications: DeFi as the New Frontier

Institutional investors now face a stark choice: avoid stablecoins entirely, or embrace decentralized finance. This shift could unlock billions in new capital for DeFi, pushing Ethereum’s Total Value Locked (TVL) to new highs.

The GENIUS Act may have inadvertently created a financial vacuum that only decentralized platforms can fill. This could force regulators to revisit DeFi frameworks sooner than expected.


GENIUS Act Passes With Rare Bipartisan Support

In an era of political gridlock, the GENIUS Act passed with over 300 votes in the House, including 102 Democrats. Lawmakers from both parties recognized the need to protect the U.S. dollar’s dominance in global finance while allowing for responsible digital innovation.

This rare cooperation suggests that Washington may finally be ready to regulate crypto, not by stifling it, but by laying down clear, enforceable guardrails.


The Future of Stablecoins in the U.S.

With the passage of the GENIUS Act, stablecoin issuers now face a future defined by transparency, accountability, and regulation. But they also face a competitive new landscape — one where consumer trust must be earned, not assumed.

As Circle, Tether, and emerging startups adjust to this legal evolution, we may also see new entrants designed from the ground up to meet these requirements.

Whether this creates a safer digital economy or simply pushes innovation offshore is a question regulators and the market will soon answer.


Final Thoughts: GENIUS or Limiting?

The GENIUS Act is being hailed as a visionary step for crypto regulation in the U.S. But it’s not without its critics. Yield bans may slow adoption. Strict structures may deter competition. Yet, in the eyes of many, it offers something the crypto world has long demanded: legitimacy.

If stablecoins are going to serve billions and anchor global commerce, then guardrails like those in the GENIUS Act may be not only necessary but inevitable.

Tech

Why Disney’s OpenAI Alliance Is a Blueprint for the Future of AI Content Deals

Disney’s $1 billion investment in OpenAI reframes AI not as a threat to IP, but as the next evolution of merchandising, engagement, and brand control

Published

on

By

Why Disney’s OpenAI Alliance Is a Blueprint for the Future of AI Content Deals
Disney’s partnership with OpenAI signals how major studios may integrate AI into content, merchandising, and fan engagement

When Disney announced a three-year alliance with OpenAI, including a reported $1 billion investment and licensing its iconic characters for use in AI-generated images and short videos, the deal left many observers puzzled. After all, recent content partnerships between OpenAI and platforms like Reddit have raised uncomfortable questions about whether the money is worth the long-term competitive and brand risks.

But Disney’s deal makes far more sense when viewed through a lens the company understands better than almost anyone: merchandising.

Why Disney’s OpenAI Alliance Is a Blueprint for the Future of AI Content Deals


For decades, Disney has mastered the art of turning intellectual property into obsession, engagement, and spending. Toys, backpacks, lunchboxes, theme parks, movies, cruise lines — all are part of a tightly controlled ecosystem designed to keep fans immersed. With OpenAI, Disney isn’t abandoning that playbook. It’s updating it.

Instead of plastic figurines, the new merchandise is synthetic content — AI-generated images and videos created by fans themselves using ChatGPT and Sora, OpenAI’s text-to-video generator. Anyone can now generate Disney-adjacent creative output, but under rules that Disney helps define.

AI as the Next Merchandising Channel

At first glance, allowing fans to generate content featuring Disney characters may appear risky, especially for a company long known as a highly curated, “predator-free” brand sanctuary in an internet dominated by chaotic user-generated content — or what critics increasingly call “AI slop.”

Yet this is precisely why Disney’s approach stands out.

Rather than fighting AI outright, Disney is licensing its characters under controlled conditions, positioning itself inside the technology rather than outside it. In doing so, it gains something arguably more valuable than licensing fees: influence over how its IP is used.

OpenAI has publicly committed to “responsible use” of Disney’s content, reducing the risk of beloved characters being placed in offensive, bizarre, or legally risky scenarios — or interacting with rival corporate IPs in ways Disney cannot control.

At the same time, Disney has made it clear it will aggressively defend its characters elsewhere. The company recently sent a letter to Google demanding it stop using Disney characters in AI-generated content without permission. The message is clear: AI use is allowed — but only on Disney’s terms.

Strategic Upside Beyond Licensing

Beyond brand protection, the OpenAI alliance offers Disney several strategic advantages.

First, by taking an equity stake, Disney is effectively hitching its future to the first major AI mover in consumer-facing generative technology. If OpenAI becomes as foundational as search or social media, Disney isn’t just a customer — it’s a stakeholder.

Second, Disney gains access to OpenAI’s tools, opening new creative and operational possibilities across film, television, marketing, and theme park experiences. In an industry under constant pressure to produce more content faster, AI-assisted workflows could become a competitive necessity.

There is also a discovery angle. If fans create something genuinely magical using Disney IP, the company can surface that work on its streaming platforms or internal creative pipelines. Just as YouTube became a feeder system for Hollywood talent, AI could quietly become a testing ground for future Pixar, Marvel, or animation concepts.

Engagement Over Everything

Critics will argue that Disney is aligning itself with what many still see as the entertainment industry’s newest villain. And history suggests that user-generated ecosystems inevitably produce strange, uncomfortable, or downright bizarre content.

But Disney’s calculus is simple: engagement beats purity.

Why Disney’s OpenAI Alliance Is a Blueprint for the Future of AI Content Deals


Even if some brand dilution occurs, the upside of keeping millions of users actively interacting with Disney characters — thinking about them, remixing them, and emotionally investing in them — far outweighs the risks. Every AI-generated image or short video becomes another touchpoint in the Disney funnel, nudging users toward movies, merchandise, theme parks, and subscriptions.

As the company has proven time and again, Disney doesn’t need to control every moment — it just needs to own the ecosystem those moments live in.

A Template for Future AI Deals

Ultimately, Disney’s OpenAI alliance may become the template for how major IP holders navigate the AI era. Rather than blocking generative tools outright or selling content libraries cheaply, Disney is treating AI as the next distribution and merchandising layer.

The pipeline that once ran from movies to toys to theme parks now runs through algorithms, prompts, and synthetic media. AI is no longer outside the business. It is part of the machine.

And if Disney’s history is any guide, once the House of Mouse embraces a platform, it rarely lets go.

Continue Reading

Tech

After Losing Over $70 Billion, Mark Zuckerberg Finally Admits His Biggest Bet Is “Not Working” – Meta Plans Massive Cuts to Metaverse Budget

Meta’s multibillion-dollar Metaverse dream faces a harsh reset as Zuckerberg prepares to slash Reality Labs spending by 30% and shift focus toward AI superintelligence

Published

on

By

After years of mounting losses, Meta prepares to slash Metaverse spending as Zuckerberg pivots the company toward AI superintelligence.
After years of mounting losses, Meta prepares to slash Metaverse spending as Zuckerberg pivots the company toward AI superintelligence.

It has taken more than $70 billion in losses, multiple years of market skepticism, slow hardware adoption, and declining enthusiasm from consumers — but Mark Zuckerberg finally seems to be acknowledging what analysts have been predicting for months: Meta’s Metaverse gamble is not working as expected.

A new report from Bloomberg reveals that Meta is preparing to cut Reality Labs’ budget by nearly 30%, marking the most significant shift in strategy since the company rebranded from Facebook to Meta in 2021. These cuts are part of Meta’s 2026 annual budget plans, discussed at a series of executive meetings held last month at Zuckerberg’s Hawaii compound.

The move represents a dramatic retreat from the vision that defined Zuckerberg’s ambitions for the future — a world of interconnected virtual experiences accessed through VR headsets, smart glasses, and immersive environments.

After years of mounting losses, Meta prepares to slash Metaverse spending as Zuckerberg pivots the company toward AI superintelligence.

Reality Labs: A Costly Dream That Failed to Take Off

Reality Labs, the division responsible for Meta’s Metaverse ambitions, includes:

  • VR hardware such as the Quest headsets
  • Ray-Ban smart glasses developed with EssilorLuxottica
  • Horizon Worlds, Meta’s VR social platform
  • Upcoming AR glasses

Despite years of R&D and aggressive marketing, the Metaverse never reached mainstream adoption. Sales remained modest, interest faded, and Horizon Worlds failed to retain users beyond niche gaming communities.

Industry analysts say the lack of traction is undeniable. The Metaverse that Zuckerberg promised — a bustling, interconnected digital universe — simply hasn’t materialized.

The financial impact has been staggering:
$70+ billion in operating losses across four years, making it one of the most expensive product bets in tech history.

Not surprisingly, Meta’s stock jumped 4% after news of the possible budget cuts, signaling investor relief. As analyst Craig Huber put it:
“Smart move, just late… This is a major shift to align costs with a revenue outlook that never matched management’s expectations.”

With cuts as deep as 30%, layoffs are expected as soon as January, especially within the VR division.


A Company Pivoting Hard Toward AI Superintelligence

Meta’s Metaverse retreat isn’t happening in isolation — it comes at a time when the company is fighting to stay competitive in the global AI arms race.

After its Llama 4 model received a lukewarm response, Meta has ramped up spending and reorganized its AI divisions under the new Superintelligence Labs.

Key highlights of Meta’s AI pivot:

  • Up to $72 billion committed in capital spending for AI initiatives this year
  • Aggressive hiring across Silicon Valley, with multimillion-dollar offers made directly by Zuckerberg
  • Plans to invest $600 billion in U.S. infrastructure and jobs over the next three years, largely for AI data centers
  • A renewed push to build the compute infrastructure needed for future superintelligent systems

Zuckerberg openly stated during an earnings call that Meta is “front-loading capacity” to prepare for an AI-driven future.

Even Reality Labs is being reimagined through the AI lens — especially after Zuckerberg hired Alan Dye, a longtime Apple design executive, to lead a new creative studio within the division.

In a post on Threads, Zuckerberg said:
“We’re entering a new era where AI glasses and other devices will change how we connect with technology and each other.”

This statement alone signals how deeply AI will shape Meta’s hardware roadmap beyond the Metaverse.


The Irony: Meta Was Renamed for a Vision That Is Now Shrinking

When Facebook became Meta in October 2021, the reasoning was clear: the company wanted to symbolize its commitment to building the Metaverse.

Three years later, that same division is facing massive cuts.

After years of mounting losses, Meta prepares to slash Metaverse spending as Zuckerberg pivots the company toward AI superintelligence.


The rebranding — once touted as the gateway to the “next chapter of the internet” — now represents one of the most expensive strategic misfires in tech history.


What Comes Next for Meta?

If the proposed budget cuts go through:

  • VR development may significantly slow down
  • Horizon Worlds could receive limited investment
  • AR glasses may remain in early stages
  • Meta will prioritize AI innovation over virtual reality

This shift doesn’t necessarily mean Meta is abandoning the Metaverse entirely — but it is no longer the company’s primary bet.

Zuckerberg’s new focus is clear:
AI superintelligence, compute hardware, and next-generation devices powered by AI.

And while the Metaverse may have faded from the spotlight, Meta’s aggressive push into AI signals a new chapter — one where Zuckerberg hopes the investment will pay off sooner rather than later.

Continue Reading

Tech

Discord Checkpoint: How to Access the New Spotify-Style Recap Feature — Step-by-Step Guide

Discord’s 2025 activity recap, Checkpoint, is now live. Here’s how to find your personalized Wrapped-style summary on mobile and desktop.

Published

on

By

Discord Checkpoint: Step-by-Step Guide to Access the New 2025 Activity Recap Feature
Discord’s new Checkpoint feature gives users a Wrapped-style yearly recap, available on both mobile and desktop.

Just like Spotify Wrapped and Apple Music Replay, Discord has now introduced its own year-end recap feature called Checkpoint—a personalized activity summary highlighting how you used the platform throughout 2025.

The feature officially rolled out on December 4, 2025, and many users have already begun sharing their Wrapped-style stats online.

If you haven’t checked your Discord Checkpoint yet, here’s a complete step-by-step guide on how to view it on mobile and desktop.


How to Check Discord Checkpoint (Mobile App)

Before you begin, ensure that your Discord app has been updated to the latest version.

Step 1: Update your Discord mobile app

Visit the App Store or Google Play Store and download the latest update.

Discord Checkpoint: Step-by-Step Guide to Access the New 2025 Activity Recap Feature


Step 2: Open the app and tap your profile picture

Your profile icon is located at the bottom-right corner of the screen.

Step 3: Look for the Checkpoint tab

After tapping the profile icon, a new Checkpoint banner or tab should appear below your account details.

Step 4: Tap to view your recap

Your personalized Discord Checkpoint compilation will begin immediately—showing your activity highlights from 2025.


How to Check Discord Checkpoint (Desktop or Browser)

The recap is also accessible on both the Discord desktop app and the web version.

Step 1: Open Discord on PC

You can use the desktop app or simply log in via a browser.

Step 2: Look for the flag icon

On the top right corner of the window, you’ll see a small flag icon—this is the Checkpoint trigger.

Step 3: Click the icon

Once clicked, Discord will begin generating your Checkpoint recap automatically.


Discord Checkpoint: Step-by-Step Guide to Access the New 2025 Activity Recap Feature


Why Isn’t My Discord Checkpoint Showing?

If you don’t see the feature yet, there are a few reasons why:

1. The rollout is gradual

Discord’s Checkpoint is not yet available to all users. Some accounts may receive access in the coming days.

2. Your app might need an update

On mobile, the feature is only available on the latest version of Discord.

3. Not enough user activity

If you haven’t used Discord enough throughout the year, the system may not have sufficient data to create a recap.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending