Connect with us

Entertainment

Monster Season 3 flops on Rotten Tomatoes critics call it “a jumbled, sensational mess”

Netflix’s Monster: The Ed Gein Story becomes the lowest-rated season in Ryan Murphy’s anthology, scoring just 29% on Rotten Tomatoes despite praise for Charlie Hunnam’s performance.

Published

on

Monster Season 3 flops on Rotten Tomatoes critics call it “a sensational mess”
Monster: The Ed Gein Story debuts on Netflix with a 29% Rotten Tomatoes score, making it the lowest-rated season in Ryan Murphy’s true-crime anthology.

Netflix’s latest true-crime series Monster: The Ed Gein Story is facing a harsh reality check from critics. The highly anticipated third installment in Ryan Murphy’s anthology has debuted to largely negative reviews, earning the lowest Rotten Tomatoes score of the entire Monster franchise.

The series, which revisits the horrifying crimes of Ed Gein, the infamous Wisconsin killer who inspired films like Psycho and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, was expected to build on the success of Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story and The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story. Instead, it has become the franchise’s biggest critical disappointment.

Monster Season 3 flops on Rotten Tomatoes critics call it “a sensational mess”


Critics bash Monster: The Ed Gein Story

Early reviews from major outlets have been brutal. Variety’s Aramide Tinubu wrote that the show “makes Ed Gein mythical again, and in turn strips away the texture and grit that was desperately needed to make the series work.”

James Jackson from The Times (UK) called it “a dive into psychosexual murk almost drowning in its own ambitions and depravities,” while Brian Tallerico of RogerEbert.com labeled it “one of the most unfocused of Ryan Murphy’s productions.”

Meanwhile, The Guardian’s Lucy Mangan dismissed it as “nothing but voyeuristic pandering to the basest instincts of viewers.”

Other critics echoed similar sentiments. Screen Rant’s Greg MacArthur gave the season a mere 2/10 rating, saying it “elicits unpleasantries — boredom, frustration, confusion, disgust.” Collider’s Therese Lacson described the show as “pulpy and sloppy… a product of sensationalism, rage bait, and misinformation.”

Reviewers from But Why Tho? and Fish Jelly Films criticized the series for “humanizing the killer while trivializing his victims,” calling it “tone-deaf” and “exploitative.”

A few bright spots amid the backlash

Not all the feedback was negative. Outlets such as Hindustan Times and Heaven of Horror praised Charlie Hunnam’s intense portrayal of Ed Gein and the show’s haunting production design. However, even those reviews admitted that strong performances couldn’t save a story weighed down by inconsistency and poor pacing.

Monster Season 3 flops on Rotten Tomatoes critics call it “a sensational mess”

“It’s visually striking and well-acted,” one review noted, “but narratively hollow — a disturbing story without a soul.”

Rotten Tomatoes score confirms fan divide

As of this week, Monster: The Ed Gein Story holds a 29% critic score on Rotten Tomatoes based on 17 reviews, and an audience score of 53% from more than 500 viewers.

In comparison:

  • Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story — 57% critic score
  • Monster: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story — 45% critic score

That makes The Ed Gein Story the lowest-rated entry in the Monster series to date — a worrying drop for Netflix and Ryan Murphy, who previously turned Monster into one of the platform’s biggest true-crime hits.

Fans react to the downfall

While critics panned the show for its direction and tone, some fans on social media have defended it, praising Hunnam’s acting and the series’ dark, unsettling atmosphere.

One user wrote on X (formerly Twitter):

Monster Season 3 flops on Rotten Tomatoes critics call it “a sensational mess”

    “Charlie Hunnam carried this entire show. The writing was shaky, but he made Ed Gein terrifying.”

    Another commented,

    “Not everything Ryan Murphy makes can be a masterpiece. This one tried too hard to shock and forgot to tell a story.”

    Still, the general consensus among both critics and audiences is that Monster: The Ed Gein Story fails to live up to the gripping psychological tension and cultural commentary of its predecessors.

    Can Ryan Murphy bounce back?

    With Monster now viewed as a declining series, attention turns to whether Ryan Murphy and Netflix can revive its reputation. The anthology once redefined modern true-crime television with its bold storytelling and stylized approach, but the latest installment has left even loyal fans questioning its creative direction.

    Given Murphy’s track record — from American Horror Story to The People v. O.J. Simpson — it’s unlikely this stumble will slow him down for long. But for now, Monster: The Ed Gein Story stands as a reminder that not every true-crime story can find beauty in the macabre.

    Entertainment

    “He-Man Wears a Suit…”: Why Nicholas Galitzine’s Masters of the Universe Trailer Has Fans Talking

    The iconic hero swaps Eternia for office cubicles as the first trailer teases a bold, corporate-era reinvention

    Published

    on

    By

    Nicholas Galitzine’s He-Man Enters Corporate America in Masters of the Universe Trailer

    The power of Grayskull has officially entered the corporate grind.

    The first trailer for Masters of the Universe has landed — and it delivers a twist that few lifelong fans of the franchise expected. Instead of roaring into battle with sword raised, Nicholas Galitzine’s He-Man is introduced navigating the fluorescent lights and soul-crushing routines of corporate America.

    Yes, that He-Man.

    The footage suggests a radical reimagining: Prince Adam, stripped of memory and purpose, appears trapped in a modern-day office job — far removed from the fantasy world of Eternia that once defined him.

    “This isn’t the He-Man you grew up with,” the trailer seems to whisper. “This is the one who forgot who he was.”


    A Fish-Out-of-Water Origin Story for a New Generation

    Rather than relying on pure nostalgia, the new Masters of the Universe appears to lean into contrast — mythic strength versus modern monotony.

    ALSO READ : He Predicted Trump’s Kennedy Center Move… Then Bought the Domain: Meet the TV Writer Turning Power Into Punchlines

    Sources close to the production say the film explores identity, purpose, and power in a world that doesn’t believe in heroes anymore. It’s a familiar Hollywood theme, but placing He-Man inside a cubicle rather than a battlefield gives it a sharp, self-aware edge.

    Galitzine, best known for his dramatic and romantic roles, brings a restrained intensity to the character — suggesting a version of He-Man who must rediscover strength rather than simply wield it.


    A Franchise Reborn for the Live-Action Era

    The Masters of the Universe franchise, originally created by Mattel, has lived many lives — from animated classics to reboots and streaming revivals. But this live-action adaptation signals a clear desire to modernize the mythology for audiences raised on superhero origin stories with emotional weight.

    Nicholas Galitzine’s He-Man Enters Corporate America in Masters of the Universe Trailer


    Hollywood insiders note that grounding legendary characters in familiar, everyday environments has become a reliable way to expand franchises without alienating new viewers.

    “It’s less about muscles now,” one executive joked, “and more about meaning.”


    Why This Trailer Has Fans Divided — and Talking

    Predictably, the internet reacted fast — and loudly.

    Longtime fans expressed shock at seeing He-Man in business attire, while others praised the creative risk, calling it “unexpected,” “bold,” and “surprisingly smart.”

    Whether embraced or rejected, one thing is certain:
    The trailer has succeeded in doing what studios crave most — starting a conversation.


    What Comes Next for He-Man

    The footage hints that Eternia hasn’t been erased — only forgotten. As Prince Adam’s past begins to resurface, the transformation into He-Man looks set to be earned rather than automatic.

    For a franchise built on raw power, this version seems more interested in asking why power matters at all.

    And that, perhaps, is the most modern update of all.

    Continue Reading

    Entertainment

    Camilla Läckberg Isn’t Done Yet… The Queen of Swedish Noir Eyes Film, TV and a Bold Plan to ‘Conquer America’

    From bestselling crime novels to international TV screens, Camilla Läckberg opens up about adapting her stories, experimenting with reality television, and why breaking into the U.S. market feels like her most thrilling mystery yet.

    Published

    on

    By

    Camilla Läckberg on TV, Film and Her Dream to Conquer America
    Camilla Läckberg, the bestselling Swedish crime author, continues her global expansion with new film, TV, and streaming projects.

    For decades, Camilla Läckberg has been a defining voice of Scandinavian crime fiction — a genre often labeled Nordic Noir but powered by something far more intimate than icy landscapes and clever murders. Her stories, rooted in psychology, family tensions, and the quiet menace of small-town life, have sold millions of copies worldwide. Now, the author widely known as the Queen of Swedish Noir is charting a new chapter: film, television, and an ambitious push into the American market.

    Läckberg’s latest moment in the global spotlight comes as Camilla Läckberg’s Erica lands on MHz Choice, shortly after audiences discovered The Glass Dome on Netflix. For fans of her work, this feels less like a debut and more like a long-overdue expansion. For Läckberg herself, it is the result of years of creative curiosity — and a willingness to step outside the safety of the written page.

    From Page to Screen: Letting Go of Control

    Adapting bestselling novels for television can be a delicate process, especially for an author whose readership spans continents. Läckberg has been candid about how difficult — and necessary — it was to loosen her grip on her characters when they entered the world of screenwriting.

    ALSO READ : “She Never Made It Out…” Albany House Fire Claims Woman’s Life as Family Pleads for Help to Bring Her Home

    Unlike novels, where every thought and detail can be spelled out, television demands collaboration. Directors, actors, producers, and editors all bring their own interpretations. Läckberg has embraced this shift, seeing it not as a loss of authorship but as an evolution of storytelling. The emotional truth, she says, matters more than strict fidelity to the page.

    That mindset is visible in Camilla Läckberg’s Erica, which draws from her iconic Fjällbacka series while allowing room for reinvention. The show keeps her signature tension intact but updates pacing and tone for modern audiences who binge rather than browse.

    Why Crime Stories Still Matter

    Despite her growing presence in entertainment formats, Läckberg remains deeply connected to crime fiction’s core purpose. Her stories are rarely just about who committed the crime; they are about why. Abuse, generational trauma, jealousy, and power dynamics frequently sit at the heart of her narratives.

    This emotional grounding is one reason her work travels so well internationally. Whether set in Sweden or adapted for global screens, the conflicts feel universal. Viewers may not recognize the snowy coastal towns, but they recognize broken families, hidden secrets, and moral ambiguity.

    In an era dominated by fast-paced thrillers, Läckberg’s work stands out for its patience. She trusts audiences to sit with discomfort — and that trust has paid off.

    Reality TV and Reinvention

    Perhaps the most surprising twist in Läckberg’s career is her openness to reality television. Alongside scripted dramas, she has appeared on competition shows and, more recently, in a reality series centered on her family life.

    Camilla Läckberg on TV, Film and Her Dream to Conquer America


    For a writer known for dark, carefully structured narratives, this move raised eyebrows. But Läckberg views it as another form of storytelling — one grounded in authenticity rather than suspense. Sharing her everyday life, she has said, helped humanize her public image and challenged the stereotype of the reclusive crime author.

    It also reflects a broader trend in modern media: audiences crave connection as much as content. Läckberg’s willingness to show vulnerability, humor, and imperfection has earned her a new kind of following — one that extends beyond bookshops and streaming platforms.

    “Conquering America”: A Calculated Dream

    Läckberg doesn’t hide her ambition. Breaking into the U.S. market, she admits, feels like one of the last great challenges of her career. While Nordic Noir has enjoyed success in America, truly crossing over as a household name remains rare for non-English-language authors.

    Yet the timing may finally be right. Streaming platforms have erased borders, and American audiences are more open than ever to international stories — provided they feel authentic. With adaptations airing globally and her name increasingly attached to high-quality productions, Läckberg believes her moment is approaching.

    This isn’t about fame alone. For her, the U.S. represents creative validation: proof that stories born in a small Swedish town can resonate anywhere.

    What Comes Next

    As Läckberg balances writing, producing, and on-screen appearances, one thing remains clear: she is not slowing down. New projects are already in development, and discussions around future adaptations continue quietly behind the scenes.

    What sets her apart isn’t just productivity, but fearlessness. Few authors are willing to reimagine themselves so completely after achieving literary success. Fewer still do it with such self-awareness.

    For fans old and new, Camilla Läckberg’s evolving career offers a reminder that good stories don’t belong to a single format — and that even the most familiar voices can still surprise us.

    Continue Reading

    Entertainment

    “Screaming, Crying, Almost Throwing Up”… Sundance Insiders Reveal the Untold Chaos Behind America’s Most Influential Film Festival

    As the Sundance Film Festival prepares for a historic relocation to Boulder, Colorado, filmmakers, actors, and insiders look back at the nerves, breakthroughs, and life-changing moments that reshaped independent cinema forever.

    Published

    on

    By

    Sundance Film Festival Oral History: Inside the Chaos That Changed Indie Cinema
    A packed screening at the Sundance Film Festival, where careers were made, nerves were shattered, and independent cinema found its voice.

    For generations of filmmakers, three words have carried equal parts magic and terror: Sundance Film Festival. It is where careers are born, confidence is tested, and raw storytelling collides with unforgiving audiences. Now, as the iconic festival prepares to take its final bow in Utah before relocating to Boulder, those who lived through its defining moments are finally opening up.

    The memories are visceral. Alumni describe shaking hands before premieres, nausea during packed screenings, and the unmistakable sound of silence — or applause — that decided their futures in seconds. “I was screaming, crying, almost throwing up,” one filmmaker recalls, echoing a shared sentiment that Sundance is less a festival and more an emotional trial by fire.

    Where Independent Cinema Found Its Voice

    Founded under the vision of Robert Redford, Sundance wasn’t designed to be comfortable. It was built to challenge Hollywood norms, giving space to films that didn’t fit studio formulas. Over time, that rebellious spirit became its identity.

    ALSO READ : “She Never Made It Out…” Albany House Fire Claims Woman’s Life as Family Pleads for Help to Bring Her Home

    From its earliest days, Sundance rewrote the rules of who gets to be seen — and heard. Low-budget films, first-time directors, and unconventional stories found audiences hungry for authenticity. Many of today’s most respected filmmakers trace their breakthroughs back to a snowy screening room and a roomful of strangers willing to take a risk.

    The festival didn’t just showcase films; it created a marketplace of ideas. Deals were struck in coffee shops, reputations were built overnight, and rejection was as common as discovery. That unpredictability is exactly what made Sundance matter.

    “You Never Forget Your First Screening”

    Ask any Sundance alum about their first screening, and the response is rarely polished. Words like panic, terror, and relief surface again and again. One director remembers gripping their seat, convinced the audience hated every frame — until the credits rolled and applause erupted. Another recalls leaving mid-screening, unable to bear the tension.

    This emotional intensity became a rite of passage. Sundance audiences are famously discerning, sometimes brutally honest. But when they connect with a film, the reaction can be transformative. Careers have launched from a single standing ovation, while others learned harsh lessons about resilience and reinvention.

    Sundance Film Festival Oral History: Inside the Chaos That Changed Indie Cinema


    The Festival That Changed Hollywood’s Math

    Sundance’s influence stretches far beyond awards or premieres. It altered how films are financed, distributed, and valued. Long before streaming platforms dominated the industry, Sundance proved that independent stories could attract mainstream attention — and profit.

    Distributors scouted aggressively, critics shaped narratives overnight, and word of mouth became currency. Films that arrived without expectations often left with global buzz. The festival turned risk into reward and showed Hollywood that originality had a market.

    A Bittersweet Goodbye to an Era

    The decision to relocate the festival marks the end of a deeply emotional chapter. For many, Utah’s mountains are inseparable from Sundance’s soul — the late-night debates, snow-covered sidewalks, and chance encounters that felt cinematic themselves.

    Moving to Boulder, Colorado, signals evolution rather than erasure. Organizers insist the festival’s mission remains unchanged: championing bold voices and challenging storytelling conventions. Still, the farewell has prompted reflection — and gratitude — from those whose lives were forever altered by a Sundance screening.

    Why Sundance Still Matters

    In an age of algorithms and instant content, Sundance remains stubbornly human. It thrives on risk, discomfort, and emotional honesty. Filmmakers don’t just present movies; they present themselves, vulnerable and exposed.

    As the festival enters its next phase, its legacy is already secure. Sundance didn’t just launch films — it launched belief. Belief that stories from the margins deserve the spotlight, and that cinema, at its best, should make you feel something intensely… even if that feeling is terror.

    And for those who survived their Sundance debut, one truth remains universal: you never forget the moment the lights go down — and everything changes.

    Continue Reading
    Advertisement

    Trending